BUSE
Price
$30.86
Change
-$0.42 (-1.34%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HFWA
Price
$29.73
Change
+$0.18 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs HFWA

BUSE vs HFWA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. HFWA commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a StrongBuy and HFWA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BUSE: $30.86 vs. HFWA: $29.73)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and HFWA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 72% vs. HFWA: 82%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.57B vs. HFWA: $1.22B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.57B. HFWA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHFWA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the long-term than HFWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFWA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HFWA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while HFWA (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($2.57B) has a higher market cap than HFWA($1.22B). HFWA has higher P/E ratio than BUSE: HFWA (14.16) vs BUSE (12.60). BUSE YTD gains are higher at: 33.515 vs. HFWA (27.996). BUSE has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. HFWA (52.6M). HFWA has less debt than BUSE: HFWA (42.4M) vs BUSE (506M). BUSE has higher revenues than HFWA: BUSE (791M) vs HFWA (266M).
BUSEHFWABUSE / HFWA
Capitalization2.57B1.22B211%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.51527.996120%
P/E Ratio12.6014.1689%
Revenue791M266M297%
Total Cash169M52.6M321%
Total Debt506M42.4M1,193%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs HFWA: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
HFWA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4363
SMR RATING
1..100
3761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8264
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (28). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (63). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (61). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (45). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (82). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEHFWA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAMC53.74-0.02
-0.04%
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
COSW40.20-0.24
-0.59%
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
CORO35.66-0.25
-0.70%
iShares International Country Rot ActETF
NBH10.17-0.12
-1.13%
Neuberger Municipal Fund Inc.
EWL63.16-0.76
-1.19%
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with PRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then PRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-1.34%
PRK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
EFSC - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
TRMK - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
BY - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
SHBI - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
More