Advertisement
FULT vs HFWA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Hold and HFWA is a Hold.
FULT in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 07, 2026
FULT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 25 of 37 cases where FULT's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FULT's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 13 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FULT as a result. In 43 of 78 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FULT just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where FULT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +2.52% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FULT advanced for three days, in 180 of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FULT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
The Aroon Indicator for FULT entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 40 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.187) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (10.729) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.270) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.034) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.178) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FULT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
HFWA's Stochastic Oscillator climbs into overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for HFWA moved into overbought territory on October 21, 2026. Be on the watch for a price drop or consolidation in the future -- when this happens, think about selling the stock or exploring put options.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HFWA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
The Aroon Indicator for HFWA entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where HFWA's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 15 of 24 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HFWA as a result. In 61 of 88 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HFWA just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where HFWA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +2.49% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HFWA advanced for three days, in 198 of 301 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
HFWA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HFWA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.021) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (12.995) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.060) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.036) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.561) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HFWA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
FULT | HFWA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FULT's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (50). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFWA (69). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (26). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (49). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (63). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.
| FULT | HFWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 59% | 9 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while HFWA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFWA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HFWA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while HFWA (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
FULT is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2027.
HFWA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+2.63% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
HFWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with FULT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then FULT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFWA | 100% | -0.61% | ||
| FULT - HFWA | 83% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NBTB - HFWA | 82% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| BUSE - HFWA | 82% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| STBA - HFWA | 82% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| MPB - HFWA | 81% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||