BWA
Price
$31.80
Change
-$0.92 (-2.81%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.09B
15 days until earnings call
GT
Price
$9.35
Change
+$0.09 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jan 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.9B
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BWA vs GT

Header iconBWA vs GT Comparison
Open Charts BWA vs GTBanner chart's image
BorgWarner
Price$31.80
Change-$0.92 (-2.81%)
Volume$18.21K
Capitalization8.09B
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$9.35
Change+$0.09 (+0.97%)
Volume$26.63K
Capitalization3.9B
BWA vs GT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWA vs. GT commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWA is a Hold and GT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BWA: $32.72 vs. GT: $9.26)
Brand notoriety: BWA: Not notable vs. GT: Notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWA: 123% vs. GT: 112%
Market capitalization -- BWA: $8.09B vs. GT: $3.9B
BWA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.09B. GT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWA is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than BWA.

Price Growth

BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWA is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

GT is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.82% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWA($8.09B) has a higher market cap than GT($3.9B). GT has higher P/E ratio than BWA: GT (769.23) vs BWA (12.98). BWA (2.925) and GT (2.889) have similar YTD gains . BWA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. GT (856M). BWA has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. GT (902M). BWA has less debt than GT: BWA (3.93B) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than BWA: GT (20.1B) vs BWA (14.2B).
BWAGTBWA / GT
Capitalization8.09B3.9B207%
EBITDA1.65B856M192%
Gain YTD2.9252.889101%
P/E Ratio12.98769.232%
Revenue14.2B20.1B71%
Total Cash1.53B902M170%
Total Debt3.93B8.65B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWA vs GT: Fundamental Ratings
BWA
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWA's Valuation (38) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (98) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's SMR Rating (56) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (92) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (58) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWA (61) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FRSGX41.350.66
+1.62%
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth A
CETAX12.110.17
+1.42%
Centerstone Investors A
RGAGX77.980.90
+1.17%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
ABECX20.880.14
+0.68%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq C
GMAYX24.50N/A
N/A
GMO Small Cap Quality I

BWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWA has been closely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWA jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWA
1D Price
Change %
BWA100%
+1.33%
VC - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
+3.52%
GNTX - BWA
72%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
LEA - BWA
69%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
MGA - BWA
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
ALV - BWA
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
More

GT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GT has been loosely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GT jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GT
1D Price
Change %
GT100%
-1.28%
VC - GT
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.52%
MGA - GT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
BWA - GT
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
DAN - GT
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.42%
AXL - GT
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More