BWA
Price
$27.21
Change
+$0.31 (+1.15%)
Updated
Apr 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.09B
13 days until earnings call
GT
Price
$10.70
Change
+$0.25 (+2.39%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BWA vs GT

Header iconBWA vs GT Comparison
Open Charts BWA vs GTBanner chart's image
BorgWarner
Price$27.21
Change+$0.31 (+1.15%)
Volume$4.25K
Capitalization8.09B
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (The)
Price$10.70
Change+$0.25 (+2.39%)
Volume$5.9M
Capitalization3.9B
BWA vs GT Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWA vs. GT commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWA is a Buy and GT is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BWA: $27.23 vs. GT: $10.70)
Brand notoriety: BWA: Not notable vs. GT: Notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWA: 36% vs. GT: 89%
Market capitalization -- BWA: $8.09B vs. GT: $3.9B
BWA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.09B. GT’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWA is a better buy in the long-term than GT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GT is a better buy in the short-term than BWA.

Price Growth

BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.65% price change this week, while GT (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +10.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

GT is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.19% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWA($8.09B) has a higher market cap than GT($3.9B). GT has higher P/E ratio than BWA: GT (769.23) vs BWA (12.98). GT YTD gains are higher at: 18.889 vs. BWA (-15.068). BWA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. GT (856M). BWA has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. GT (902M). BWA has less debt than GT: BWA (3.93B) vs GT (8.65B). GT has higher revenues than BWA: GT (20.1B) vs BWA (14.2B).
BWAGTBWA / GT
Capitalization8.09B3.9B207%
EBITDA1.65B856M192%
Gain YTD-15.06818.889-80%
P/E Ratio12.98769.232%
Revenue14.2B20.1B71%
Total Cash1.53B902M170%
Total Debt3.93B8.65B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWA vs GT: Fundamental Ratings
BWA
GT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6973
SMR RATING
1..100
8188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1535
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWA's Valuation (39) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GT (79) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GT’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (73) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's SMR Rating (81) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (88) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

GT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as BWA (63) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GT’s stock grew similarly to BWA’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GT (35) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBJP72.111.50
+2.12%
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
FFLS23.240.17
+0.74%
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
IVAL25.920.02
+0.08%
Alpha Architect Intl Quant Val ETF
CADNZD1.21N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
FENY22.24-0.04
-0.18%
Fidelity MSCI Energy ETF

BWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWA
1D Price
Change %
BWA100%
+2.44%
LEA - BWA
76%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
VC - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
+2.73%
GNTX - BWA
72%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
ALV - BWA
71%
Closely correlated
+3.38%
MGA - BWA
69%
Closely correlated
+2.29%
More