BXP
Price
$59.04
Change
-$0.28 (-0.47%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.97B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLG
Price
$48.43
Change
-$0.51 (-1.04%)
Updated
Oct 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.49B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXP vs SLG

BXP vs SLG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXP vs. SLG commentary
Oct 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXP is a Hold and SLG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXP vs SLG: Fundamental Ratings
BXP
SLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
8192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXP's Valuation (44) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLG (84). This means that BXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.

SLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BXP (100). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to BXP’s over the last 12 months.

BXP's SMR Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (92). This means that BXP’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

BXP's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (50). This means that BXP’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

BXP's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (65). This means that BXP’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXPSLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2026
Stock price -- (BXP: $59.32 vs. SLG: $48.94)
Brand notoriety: BXP and SLG are both not notable
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXP: 147% vs. SLG: 124%
Market capitalization -- BXP: $9.97B vs. SLG: $3.49B

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BXP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXP is a better buy in the long-term than SLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLG is a better buy in the short-term than BXP.

Reported Earning Dates

BXP is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

SLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOAT53.381.13
+2.16%
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT)
LTL24.260.28
+1.17%
ProShares Ultra Communication Services (LTL)
FTBD46.950.08
+0.18%
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD)
FINS11.890.01
+0.08%
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust
DFSU47.88-0.04
-0.08%
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU)

BXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXP has been closely correlated with VNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BXP jumps, then VNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXP
1D Price
Change %
BXP100%
-0.17%
VNO - BXP
81%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
CUZ - BXP
78%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
HIW - BXP
77%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
KRC - BXP
73%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
DEI - BXP
72%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
More

SLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLG has been closely correlated with CUZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLG jumps, then CUZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLG
1D Price
Change %
SLG100%
+0.70%
CUZ - SLG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
VNO - SLG
80%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
DEI - SLG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
BXP - SLG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
HIW - SLG
76%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
More