BXRBF
Price
$6.30
Change
+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
UBCP
Price
$13.11
Change
-$0.84 (-6.02%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BXRBF vs UBCP

Header iconBXRBF vs UBCP Comparison
Open Charts BXRBF vs UBCPBanner chart's image
Bendigo & Adelaide Bank
Price$6.30
Change+$0.52 (+9.00%)
Volume$897
CapitalizationN/A
United Ban
Price$13.11
Change-$0.84 (-6.02%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BXRBF vs UBCP Comparison Chart
Loading...
UBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXRBF vs. UBCP commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXRBF is a Buy and UBCP is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BXRBF: $6.30 vs. UBCP: $13.08)
Brand notoriety: BXRBF and UBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXRBF: 100% vs. UBCP: 96%
Market capitalization -- BXRBF: $3.78B vs. UBCP: $82.52M
BXRBF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.78B. UBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXRBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BXRBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the long-term than BXRBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UBCP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UBCP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BXRBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

UBCP is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXRBF($3.78B) has a higher market cap than UBCP($82.5M). BXRBF has higher P/E ratio than UBCP: BXRBF (11.37) vs UBCP (9.46). UBCP YTD gains are higher at: 9.036 vs. BXRBF (0.000). UBCP has less debt than BXRBF: UBCP (102M) vs BXRBF (12.6B). BXRBF has higher revenues than UBCP: BXRBF (2.03B) vs UBCP (29.9M).
BXRBFUBCPBXRBF / UBCP
Capitalization3.78B82.5M4,584%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0009.036-
P/E Ratio11.379.46120%
Revenue2.03B29.9M6,786%
Total CashN/A7.95M-
Total Debt12.6B102M12,353%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXRBF vs UBCP: Fundamental Ratings
BXRBF
UBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXRBF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as UBCP (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BXRBF’s stock grew similarly to UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BXRBF (100) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

BXRBF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBCP (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BXRBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBCP’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BXRBF (55) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

UBCP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BXRBF (76) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BXRBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXRBFUBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GQESX33.33-0.09
-0.27%
GMO Quality R6
PIERX26.17-0.09
-0.34%
Putnam International Equity R
HFYSX10.16-0.08
-0.78%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
SHDRX11.18-0.11
-0.97%
American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Eq R6
ISOPX19.29-0.19
-0.98%
Voya SmallCap Opportunities Port A

BXRBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXRBF has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXRBF jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXRBF
1D Price
Change %
BXRBF100%
N/A
CMGGF - BXRBF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SFDL - BXRBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRL - BXRBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
TCBS - BXRBF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
UBCP - BXRBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
More

UBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBCP and TFC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBCP and TFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBCP
1D Price
Change %
UBCP100%
-6.24%
TFC - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.48%
NSTS - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKSC - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
CMA - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.09%
MGYR - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More