BXSL
Price
$26.12
Change
+$0.37 (+1.44%)
Updated
Oct 8, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.93B
29 days until earnings call
CGBD
Price
$12.18
Change
+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Updated
Oct 8, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
885.04M
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BXSL vs CGBD

Header iconBXSL vs CGBD Comparison
Open Charts BXSL vs CGBDBanner chart's image
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
Price$26.12
Change+$0.37 (+1.44%)
Volume$11.88K
Capitalization5.93B
Carlyle Secured Lending
Price$12.18
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Volume$8.21K
Capitalization885.04M
BXSL vs CGBD Comparison Chart in %
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXSL vs. CGBD commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXSL is a Buy and CGBD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BXSL: $25.75 vs. CGBD: $12.14)
Brand notoriety: BXSL and CGBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXSL: 142% vs. CGBD: 132%
Market capitalization -- BXSL: $5.93B vs. CGBD: $885.04M
BXSL [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.93B. CGBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $885.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $180.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXSL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCGBD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BXSL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CGBD’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the long-term than BXSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXSL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGBD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXSL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CGBD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CGBD is a better buy in the short-term than BXSL.

Price Growth

BXSL (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while CGBD (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

CGBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.48% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BXSL($5.93B) has a higher market cap than CGBD($885M). CGBD has higher P/E ratio than BXSL: CGBD (10.38) vs BXSL (9.16). BXSL YTD gains are higher at: -13.867 vs. CGBD (-26.128). BXSL has more cash in the bank: 197M vs. CGBD (22.7M). CGBD has less debt than BXSL: CGBD (1.31B) vs BXSL (7.09B). BXSL has higher revenues than CGBD: BXSL (662M) vs CGBD (79.8M).
BXSLCGBDBXSL / CGBD
Capitalization5.93B885M670%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.867-26.12853%
P/E Ratio9.1610.3888%
Revenue662M79.8M830%
Total Cash197M22.7M868%
Total Debt7.09B1.31B542%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CGBD: Fundamental Ratings
CGBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
57
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXSLCGBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BXSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CGBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSUTX68.93N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights Inv
FRSIX18.59N/A
N/A
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth C
AYBLX12.63N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Balanced Y
HJIRX17.81N/A
N/A
Hardman Johnston Intl Gr Fd Retl Shr
RAFGX48.56-0.19
-0.39%
American Funds AMCAP R6

BXSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXSL has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BXSL jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXSL
1D Price
Change %
BXSL100%
-1.11%
OBDC - BXSL
84%
Closely correlated
N/A
ARCC - BXSL
78%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
GSBD - BXSL
77%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
BCSF - BXSL
75%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
MAIN - BXSL
75%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
More

CGBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBD has been closely correlated with GSBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBD jumps, then GSBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CGBD
1D Price
Change %
CGBD100%
-1.06%
GSBD - CGBD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
BCSF - CGBD
72%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
OBDC - CGBD
70%
Closely correlated
N/A
BXSL - CGBD
70%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
NCDL - CGBD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
More