BY
Price
$36.05
Change
+$0.58 (+1.63%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.61B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CARE
Price
$32.18
Change
+$0.66 (+2.09%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
699.99M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs CARE

BY vs CARE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BY vs. CARE commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Buy and CARE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BY: $35.48 vs. CARE: $31.50)
Brand notoriety: BY and CARE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 98% vs. CARE: 125%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.61B vs. CARE: $699.99M
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.61B. CARE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $699.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCARE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CARE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than CARE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CARE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CARE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the short-term than CARE.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while CARE (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

CARE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.24% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BY($1.61B) has a higher market cap than CARE($700M). BY has higher P/E ratio than CARE: BY (11.52) vs CARE (6.47). CARE YTD gains are higher at: 60.835 vs. BY (22.622). BY has more cash in the bank: 60.2M vs. CARE (36.9M). CARE has less debt than BY: CARE (178M) vs BY (580M). BY has higher revenues than CARE: BY (450M) vs CARE (219M).
BYCAREBY / CARE
Capitalization1.61B700M230%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.62260.83537%
P/E Ratio11.526.47178%
Revenue450M219M205%
Total Cash60.2M36.9M163%
Total Debt580M178M326%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs CARE: Fundamental Ratings
BY
CARE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4246
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4024
SMR RATING
1..100
4235
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (71). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (40). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (42). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BY (44). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to BY’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARE (93). This means that BY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYCARE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CARE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAIEX18.35N/A
N/A
Optimum International A
JFARX35.52N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core R4
PRGFX111.33N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
DDDIX26.56N/A
N/A
13D Activist I
IOGYX58.00N/A
N/A
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R5

CARE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARE has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CARE jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARE
1D Price
Change %
CARE100%
+1.74%
SRCE - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
GSBC - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
BY - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
EFSC - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
CCNE - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
More