CARE
Price
$32.18
Change
+$0.66 (+2.09%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
699.99M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSBC
Price
$76.03
Change
+$1.22 (+1.63%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
818.73M
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CARE vs GSBC

CARE vs GSBC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CARE vs. GSBC commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARE is a Buy and GSBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CARE: $31.50 vs. GSBC: $75.16)
Brand notoriety: CARE and GSBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CARE: 125% vs. GSBC: 67%
Market capitalization -- CARE: $699.99M vs. GSBC: $818.73M
CARE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $699.99M. GSBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $818.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CARE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CARE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBC is a better buy in the long-term than CARE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CARE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CARE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CARE and GSBC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CARE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.49% price change this week, while GSBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CARE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

GSBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.88% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSBC($819M) has a higher market cap than CARE($700M). GSBC has higher P/E ratio than CARE: GSBC (11.93) vs CARE (6.47). CARE YTD gains are higher at: 60.835 vs. GSBC (22.944). GSBC has more cash in the bank: 94.1M vs. CARE (36.9M). CARE has less debt than GSBC: CARE (178M) vs GSBC (496M). GSBC (229M) and CARE (219M) have equivalent revenues.
CAREGSBCCARE / GSBC
Capitalization700M819M85%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD60.83522.944265%
P/E Ratio6.4711.9354%
Revenue219M229M96%
Total Cash36.9M94.1M39%
Total Debt178M496M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CARE vs GSBC: Fundamental Ratings
CARE
GSBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4635
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2428
SMR RATING
1..100
3552
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9336
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBC's Valuation (54) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GSBC’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GSBC (28) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to GSBC’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's SMR Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GSBC (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to GSBC’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as GSBC (43) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to GSBC’s over the last 12 months.

GSBC's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CARE (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that GSBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CARE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAREGSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CARE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIFZX28.680.39
+1.38%
Saturna International Z
NWFFX109.780.58
+0.53%
American Funds New World F1
TISEX23.88N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity R6
OFAVX28.45N/A
N/A
Olstein All Cap Value A
OAZEX21.21-0.13
-0.61%
Oakmark International Small Cap R6

CARE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CARE has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CARE jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CARE
1D Price
Change %
CARE100%
+1.74%
SRCE - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
GSBC - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
BY - CARE
69%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
EFSC - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
CCNE - CARE
68%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
More

GSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBC has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSBC jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBC
1D Price
Change %
GSBC100%
+1.25%
MBWM - GSBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
PRK - GSBC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
OSBC - GSBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
BHRB - GSBC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
BUSE - GSBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More