BY
Price
$39.27
Change
+$0.05 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FVCB
Price
$18.59
Change
+$0.19 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
334.56M
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BY vs FVCB

BY vs FVCB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY) vs. FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale disparity: BY operates as a $9.8-billion-asset commercial bank serving the Chicago metropolitan area, while FVCB is a $2.3-billion-asset community bank based in Fairfax, Virginia — making BY roughly four times larger by total assets.
  • Both delivered strong earnings growth: BY posted record full-year 2025 revenue of $446.3 million with net income up 7.7%, while FVCB reported a 46% surge in net income for 2025 and a 45% increase in its most recent quarterly earnings.
  • Net interest margin (NIM) advantage: BY enjoys a substantially wider NIM of 4.35% compared to FVCB's 3.53%, though FVCB has registered ten consecutive quarters of NIM expansion.
  • Momentum diverges: FVCB has outpaced BY in year-to-date share price appreciation, climbing approximately 33% versus BY's roughly 5% gain over the same stretch.
  • Analyst sentiment: Wall Street assigns BY a consensus "Buy" rating with a $42.20 price target, while FVCB carries a "Hold" consensus, though one analyst recently raised its FVCB target to $21.
  • Capital and credit quality both solid: Both banks maintain strong CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1) capital ratios well above regulatory minimums, with BY at 12.33% and FVCB's bank subsidiary at 16.43%, signaling resilient balance sheets.

Introduction

Regional and community banks occupy a unique space in the current market environment — shaped by shifting interest-rate expectations, evolving credit conditions, and diverging regional economic backdrops. BY (Byline Bancorp, Inc.) and FVCB (FVCBankcorp, Inc.) represent two distinct plays within this segment: a mid-sized Chicago commercial lender versus a smaller but rapidly improving Virginia-based community bank. This stock comparison examines how these two institutions stack up across growth trajectory, profitability metrics, risk positioning, and market sentiment. Whether evaluating relative performance for a portfolio allocation decision or simply tracking the regional banking landscape, investors will find meaningful contrasts — and a few surprising parallels — between these two publicly traded bank holding companies.

BY Overview and Recent Performance

BY (Byline Bancorp, Inc.) is the holding company for Byline Bank, a commercial banking franchise headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, with approximately 45 branches serving small and medium-sized businesses, commercial real estate sponsors, and consumers across the Chicago and Milwaukee metropolitan areas. The company also maintains a meaningful presence in government-guaranteed lending, ranking among the most active SBA (Small Business Administration) lenders in Illinois. In recent quarters, Byline has advanced an explicit strategic objective: becoming the preeminent commercial bank in Chicago.

The bank's financial trajectory reflects this ambition. Full-year 2025 results showcased record revenues of $446.3 million and net income of $130.1 million — a 7.7% increase from the prior year. Net interest margin (NIM), a critical profitability gauge for banks that measures the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits, expanded to 4.35% in the fourth quarter, driven partly by the completed integration of the First Security Bancorp acquisition. The CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1) ratio — a key measure of a bank's core capital strength relative to risk-weighted assets — stood at 12.33%, comfortably above regulatory requirements. Tangible book value per share reached $23.44, up 16.7% year over year. In early 2026, management raised the quarterly dividend by 20% to $0.12 per share and continued share repurchases, signaling confidence in the earnings trajectory. On the stock chart, BY has moved from the mid-$25 range in mid-2025 to above $38 in recent trading, though year-to-date gains in 2026 have been relatively measured.

FVCB Overview and Recent Performance

FVCB (FVCBankcorp, Inc.) serves as the holding company for FVCbank, a community-oriented commercial bank headquartered in Fairfax, Virginia, catering to small and medium-sized businesses, professionals, nonprofits, and investors throughout the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan region. The company recently expanded its footprint with a new loan production office in Virginia Beach, signaling measured geographic growth. Unlike Byline's acquisition-driven scale strategy, FVCbank has pursued organic relationship-driven expansion.

The earnings story at FVCB has been one of striking improvement. Full-year 2025 net income jumped 46% to $22.1 million, while diluted EPS (earnings per share) rose to $1.21 from $0.82. Most recently, the company posted record quarterly earnings — $8.2 million in net income for the quarter ended June 2026, representing a 45% year-over-year increase and beating consensus estimates. NIM has now expanded for ten consecutive quarters, reaching 3.53% — up from just 2.77% at the end of 2024. The efficiency ratio, which measures non-interest expenses as a percentage of revenue (lower is better), improved to 49.71%, reflecting tighter cost discipline. Notably, the company has also reduced its commercial real estate (CRE) loan concentration from 372% of regulatory capital at year-end 2024 to 287%, a proactive de-risking move in a sector under regulatory scrutiny. The stock has responded: FVCB shares have risen roughly 33% year-to-date and approximately 40% over the trailing twelve months, substantially outpacing broader market returns.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like BY and FVCB, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway into AI-powered trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively monitor and trade thousands of tickers across equities, ETFs, and sectors — yet only the most adaptive, highest-performing strategies earn a spot in the Trending section. These bots deploy a wide range of approaches: some execute on 5-minute and 15-minute timeframes using Financial Learning Models (FLMs) trained on real-time price action, while others follow longer-duration trend-following or swing-trading methodologies. Performance metrics vary considerably across the bot universe, with select strategies posting annualized returns above 100% and profit factors exceeding 4.0 — meaning more than $4 earned for every $1 risked. Win rates among top-performing bots frequently range between 55% and 67%. Whether a trader favors aggressive intraday models or steadier multi-day trend strategies, the Trending AI Robots section provides a continuously updated selection of bots matched to current market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Placing these two banks side by side reveals contrasts that go far beyond the headline size differential. Scale and business model: BY operates at roughly $9.8 billion in total assets with an acquisitive growth strategy — the First Security Bancorp deal being the most recent example — while FVCB at $2.3 billion in assets relies on organic deposit and loan growth, supplemented by tactical moves such as its Virginia Beach expansion.

Profitability and margins: BY holds a clear lead in raw NIM at 4.35%, reflecting a loan portfolio tilted toward higher-yielding commercial and SBA-guaranteed credits. FVCB's NIM of 3.53% is narrower, but the directional trend — ten straight quarters of expansion, up 63 basis points year over year — signals accelerating earning-asset repricing power. BY's ROAA (return on average assets) of 1.41% edges FVCB's 1.48% in the most recent quarter, but FVCB's trajectory here is steepening faster.

Risk and credit quality: Both banks maintain healthy capital buffers, but FVCB's deliberate reduction of CRE concentration — from 372% down to 287% of regulatory capital — addresses a specific vulnerability that regulators and markets have scrutinized across the regional banking sector. BY, with its larger and more diversified loan book, faces different risk dynamics including integration risk from M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity. BY's non-performing assets did tick higher in mid-2025, though management characterized the deterioration as isolated rather than systemic.

Market positioning and sentiment: BY benefits from deeper analyst coverage (six analysts, consensus Buy) and the stability associated with its larger market capitalization of approximately $1.75 billion. FVCB, with a market cap near $329 million, attracts lighter coverage (two analysts) but has delivered far stronger share-price momentum — a factor that trend-sensitive investors and quantitative systems alike tend to reward.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trends in momentum, earnings acceleration, and margin expansion trajectory, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely express a near-term preference for FVCB over BY. The reasoning rests on several probabilistic signals: FVCB has sustained ten consecutive quarters of NIM improvement — a consistent directional trend that quantitative models tend to favor — alongside a 45% year-over-year earnings surge and meaningful upward estimate revisions. Its share price has demonstrated stronger relative momentum, climbing approximately 33% year-to-date versus BY's more subdued single-digit advance. That said, BY retains structural advantages in scale, absolute profitability, and a wider absolute NIM that may appeal to AI systems optimized for stability and lower-volatility outcomes. In a trend-driven model, FVCB's accelerating fundamentals and price momentum would likely tilt the probability-weighted assessment in its favor for the current cycle, while BY remains a stronger candidate for strategies emphasizing fundamental durability and lower-beta positioning within the regional banking space.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BY vs. FVCB commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BY is a Buy and FVCB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BY: $39.27 vs. FVCB: $18.59)
Brand notoriety: BY and FVCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BY: 63% vs. FVCB: 34%
Market capitalization -- BY: $1.78B vs. FVCB: $334.56M
BY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.78B. FVCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $334.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FVCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BY is a better buy in the long-term than FVCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FVCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the short-term than BY.

Price Growth

BY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while FVCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BY($1.78B) has a higher market cap than FVCB($335M). FVCB has higher P/E ratio than BY: FVCB (14.52) vs BY (12.75). BY (35.721) and FVCB (35.313) have similar YTD gains . BY has more cash in the bank: 60.2M vs. FVCB (9.44M). FVCB has less debt than BY: FVCB (30.5M) vs BY (580M). BY has higher revenues than FVCB: BY (450M) vs FVCB (68.6M).
BYFVCBBY / FVCB
Capitalization1.78B335M532%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.72135.313101%
P/E Ratio12.7514.5288%
Revenue450M68.6M656%
Total Cash60.2M9.44M638%
Total Debt580M30.5M1,902%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BY vs FVCB: Fundamental Ratings
BY
FVCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8292
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3065
SMR RATING
1..100
4368
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2527
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BY's Valuation (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (74). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FVCB (65). This means that BY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BY's SMR Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (68). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (40). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

BY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (27). This means that BY’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYFVCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FVCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALBAX103.780.84
+0.82%
Alger Growth & Income A
STBIX559.763.92
+0.71%
State Street Equity 500 Index Svc
BRUJX18.860.06
+0.32%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R1
FSSMX54.750.03
+0.05%
Fidelity Stock Selector Mid Cap
JVSIX16.86N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value I

BY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BY has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BY jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BY
1D Price
Change %
BY100%
+0.13%
FMBH - BY
87%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
IBCP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
UVSP - BY
86%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
SRCE - BY
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
GABC - BY
85%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
+1.03%
SRCE - FVCB
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
BY - FVCB
77%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
UVSP - FVCB
75%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
PEBO - FVCB
75%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
FMBH - FVCB
75%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
More