BYAGF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
OR
Price
$18.43
Change
-$0.55 (-2.90%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
62 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BYAGF vs OR

Header iconBYAGF vs OR Comparison
Open Charts BYAGF vs ORBanner chart's image
Banyan Gold
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$54.07K
CapitalizationN/A
Osisko Gold Royalties
Price$18.43
Change-$0.55 (-2.90%)
Volume$14.69K
CapitalizationN/A
BYAGF vs OR Comparison Chart
Loading...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BYAGF vs. OR commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYAGF is a Hold and OR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BYAGF: $0.13 vs. OR: $18.40)
Brand notoriety: BYAGF and OR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BYAGF: 27% vs. OR: 86%
Market capitalization -- BYAGF: $69.84M vs. OR: $3.04B
BYAGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $69.84M. OR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BYAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BYAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OR is a better buy in the long-term than BYAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BYAGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BYAGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BYAGF and OR are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BYAGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.11% price change this week, while OR (@Precious Metals) price change was -8.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

OR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OR($3.04B) has a higher market cap than BYAGF($69.8M). OR YTD gains are higher at: 28.852 vs. BYAGF (-48.652). OR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.5M vs. BYAGF (-2.8M). OR has more cash in the bank: 75.9M vs. BYAGF (6.21M). OR has higher revenues than BYAGF: OR (247M) vs BYAGF (0).
BYAGFORBYAGF / OR
Capitalization69.8M3.04B2%
EBITDA-2.8M41.5M-7%
Gain YTD-48.65228.852-169%
P/E RatioN/A86.33-
Revenue0247M-
Total Cash6.21M75.9M8%
Total DebtN/A200M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BYAGF vs OR: Fundamental Ratings
BYAGF
OR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6817
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1004
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BYAGF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OR (78). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OR’s over the last 12 months.

OR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYAGF (68). This means that OR’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

BYAGF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as OR (90). This means that BYAGF’s stock grew similarly to OR’s over the last 12 months.

OR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BYAGF (86). This means that OR’s stock grew somewhat faster than BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

OR's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BYAGF (100). This means that OR’s stock grew significantly faster than BYAGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BYAGFOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BYAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THCH0.700.07
+10.99%
TH International Limited
TOVX1.190.02
+1.71%
Theriva Biologics Inc
IRMD53.00-0.18
-0.34%
iRadimed Corp
LAUR18.78-0.20
-1.05%
Laureate Education
WPP54.25-1.34
-2.41%
WPP PLC

BYAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYAGF has been loosely correlated with VITFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BYAGF jumps, then VITFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BYAGF
1D Price
Change %
BYAGF100%
+0.30%
VITFF - BYAGF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GFI - BYAGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
IAUX - BYAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
BTG - BYAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
OR - BYAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More

OR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OR has been closely correlated with AGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OR jumps, then AGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OR
1D Price
Change %
OR100%
-3.06%
AGI - OR
74%
Closely correlated
-5.30%
AEM - OR
74%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
WPM - OR
73%
Closely correlated
-4.25%
RGLD - OR
73%
Closely correlated
-5.97%
KGC - OR
71%
Closely correlated
-5.64%
More