Advertisement
FNV vs OR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) vs. OR Royalties Inc. (OR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both FNV and OR operate in the gold royalty and streaming sector, providing leveraged exposure to precious metals prices without operational mining risks.
- FNV offers greater portfolio diversification and lower volatility (beta 0.89), trading at a premium with YTD return of 11.63% and 1-year return of 41.02%.
- OR shows stronger recent momentum with 1-year return of 62.65% and 3-year return of 124.96%, supported by record Q1 2026 results and dividend increase.
- FNV has a larger market cap ($44.8B vs. $7.2B) and zero-debt balance sheet, while OR trades at a relatively lower trailing P/E (28.67 vs. 40.30).
- Recent gold price fluctuations have pressured both stocks in recent weeks, but portfolio expansions bolster long-term positioning.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight royalty stocks amid sector momentum in precious metals.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FNV (Franco-Nevada Corporation) and OR (OR Royalties Inc.), two leading precious metals royalty and streaming companies. Both provide investors with high-margin exposure to gold and silver production through royalties and streams, avoiding the costs and risks of direct mining operations. Traders seeking relative performance insights in the gold sector, particularly amid fluctuating metal prices and geopolitical tensions, will find this analysis relevant. Investors focused on sector positioning, dividend stability, and growth catalysts in basic materials can use this head-to-head to evaluate market momentum and risk trade-offs.
FNV Overview and Recent Performance
Franco-Nevada Corporation is the world's leading gold-focused royalty and streaming company, with a diversified portfolio spanning precious metals across multiple geographies including North America, Australia, and South America. The company generates revenue primarily from gold, silver, and platinum group metals without operating mines, emphasizing an asset-light model with zero net debt and $3.1 billion in liquidity as of recent reports.
In recent market activity, FNV stock has experienced volatility tied to gold price swings, posting a YTD return of 11.63% and 1-year gain of 41.02%. Shares traded in a 52-week range of $152.89 to $285.67, reflecting resilience amid broader precious metals pressure. Key influences include record 2025 results with revenue up 64% year-over-year, new royalty acquisitions like those on Bullabulling Gold and i-80 Gold projects, and upcoming Q1 2026 earnings anticipation. Analyst upgrades and sustainability recognitions have supported sentiment, though recent weeks saw pullbacks from profit-taking after strong gains.
OR Overview and Recent Performance
OR Royalties Inc., formerly Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd, is an intermediate precious metals royalty company anchored by a 3-5% net smelter return (NSR) royalty on the Canadian Malartic mine. Its portfolio includes over 195 royalties and streams focused on gold, silver, and other metals, primarily in North America, with expansion into international assets.
Recent performance for OR reflects robust momentum, with YTD return at 6.98% and impressive 1-year return of 62.65%, outperforming benchmarks. The stock's 52-week range spans $22.40 to $48.06, driven by record Q1 2026 revenue of $102.8 million, 56% year-over-year cash flow growth, and an 18% quarterly dividend hike to $0.065 per share. Positive portfolio updates on assets like Island Gold and Dalgaranga, plus a $28 million precious metals stream acquisition on New Brunswick projects, have fueled optimism. Gold price sensitivity and higher beta (1.33) contribute to recent weekly gains amid sector rotation.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the top 25 AI trading bots out of over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ advanced AI/ML agents with diverse strategies—such as momentum, sector rotation, and volatility plays—tailored to current market conditions like high-growth tech, leveraged ETFs, and precious metals miners. Standout performers show annualized returns up to 285%, win rates of 70-88%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0, with examples including space infrastructure bots at +285% and semiconductor strategies at +96%. Selected for superior risk-adjusted stats like profit-to-drawdown ratios over 10 and low drawdowns, they adapt to volatility in sectors like gold and energy. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge in today's dynamic markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FNV and OR share a royalty/streaming business model, deriving revenue from net smelter returns (NSR) and streams on third-party mines, offering high margins (often 90%+) and inflation protection via escalating royalties. However, FNV's larger scale ($44.8B market cap vs. $7.2B) enables broader diversification across 400+ assets globally, reducing single-asset risk compared to OR's North America-heavy portfolio anchored by Canadian Malartic.
Growth drivers differ: OR pursues aggressive expansion via new streams and buybacks, yielding higher recent momentum (3-year return 125% vs. 50%), while FNV prioritizes stability with conservative leverage. Risk factors highlight FNV's lower beta (0.89 vs. 1.33), fortress balance sheet, and 0.76% dividend yield versus OR's 0.68%. Sector exposure is similar in gold (Basic Materials/Gold industry), but FNV includes energy royalties for balance. Market sentiment favors OR for value (lower P/E) amid growth, while FNV leads in consistency.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FNV for its superior trend consistency, lower volatility, and diversified positioning in the royalty space. Observable factors like zero debt, broader asset base, and outperformance versus benchmarks in recent quarters suggest higher probability of stable returns amid gold price uncertainty, though OR's catalysts could narrow the gap if momentum persists.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNV is a Hold and OR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FNV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FNV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FNV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FNV (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while OR (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
FNV is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+1.32% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| FNV | OR | FNV / OR | |
| Capitalization | 40.5B | 6.35B | 638% |
| EBITDA | 2.06B | 339M | 607% |
| Gain YTD | 1.433 | -4.259 | -34% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.50 | 25.25 | 117% |
| Revenue | 2.11B | 325M | 648% |
| Total Cash | 434M | 94.9M | 457% |
| Total Debt | 82.6M | 4.64M | 1,781% |
FNV | OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FNV's Valuation (29) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OR (74) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew somewhat faster than OR’s over the last 12 months.
OR's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (52) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.
OR's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FNV (47) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that OR’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.
FNV's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OR (62) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to OR’s over the last 12 months.
FNV's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as OR (99) in the null industry. This means that FNV’s stock grew similarly to OR’s over the last 12 months.
| FNV | OR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IWML | 32.03 | 0.44 | +1.38% |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Size Fctr TR ETN | |||
| IVV | 745.14 | 4.09 | +0.55% |
| iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | |||
| MAYM | 32.88 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May | |||
| SDG | 90.48 | -0.41 | -0.45% |
| iShares MSCI Global Sust Dev Goals ETF | |||
| NXP | 14.33 | -0.09 | -0.62% |
| Nuveen Select Tax-Free | |||
FNV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNV has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNV jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
OR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OR has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OR jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.