It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BYD’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileHGV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BYD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HGV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BYD (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while HGV (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.
BYD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
HGV is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
BYD | HGV | BYD / HGV | |
Capitalization | 6.45B | 4.9B | 132% |
EBITDA | 1.18B | 840M | 141% |
Gain YTD | 1.272 | 0.205 | 620% |
P/E Ratio | 11.06 | 16.70 | 66% |
Revenue | 3.74B | 3.98B | 94% |
Total Cash | 304M | 589M | 52% |
Total Debt | 3.73B | 4.59B | 81% |
BYD | HGV | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BYD's Valuation (28) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (85) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BYD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
BYD's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as HGV (44) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BYD’s stock grew similarly to HGV’s over the last 12 months.
BYD's SMR Rating (28) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (87) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BYD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
BYD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as HGV (59) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BYD’s stock grew similarly to HGV’s over the last 12 months.
HGV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BYD (22) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that HGV’s stock grew similarly to BYD’s over the last 12 months.
BYD | HGV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago69% | 24 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 4 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 3 days ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago75% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LQDH | 91.96 | -0.06 | -0.07% |
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF | |||
RDVI | 24.07 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF | |||
DYLD | 22.53 | -0.03 | -0.13% |
LeaderShares® Dynamic Yield ETF | |||
IPOS | 14.60 | -0.09 | -0.64% |
Renaissance International IPO ETF | |||
FJP | 58.50 | -0.87 | -1.46% |
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYD has been closely correlated with RRR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BYD jumps, then RRR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BYD | 100% | -0.58% | ||
RRR - BYD | 74% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
CZR - BYD | 73% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
GDEN - BYD | 71% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
PENN - BYD | 67% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
HGV - BYD | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HGV has been closely correlated with VAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HGV jumps, then VAC could also see price increases.