CAC
Price
$52.72
Change
+$0.86 (+1.66%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
892.76M
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HOPE
Price
$13.21
Change
+$0.24 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.69B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAC vs HOPE

CAC vs HOPE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAC vs. HOPE commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAC is a Hold and HOPE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CAC: $51.86 vs. HOPE: $12.96)
Brand notoriety: CAC and HOPE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAC: 93% vs. HOPE: 108%
Market capitalization -- CAC: $877.2M vs. HOPE: $1.69B
CAC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $877.2M. HOPE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOPE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOPE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAC is a better buy in the long-term than HOPE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOPE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOPE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAC is a better buy in the short-term than HOPE.

Price Growth

CAC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while HOPE (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

HOPE is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOPE($1.69B) has a higher market cap than CAC($893M). HOPE has higher P/E ratio than CAC: HOPE (23.56) vs CAC (11.03). CAC (21.676) and HOPE (20.932) have similar YTD gains . HOPE has more cash in the bank: 209M vs. CAC (71.5M). CAC has less debt than HOPE: CAC (313M) vs HOPE (454M). HOPE has higher revenues than CAC: HOPE (523M) vs CAC (253M).
CACHOPECAC / HOPE
Capitalization893M1.69B53%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.67620.932104%
P/E Ratio11.0323.5647%
Revenue253M523M48%
Total Cash71.5M209M34%
Total Debt313M454M69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAC vs HOPE: Fundamental Ratings
CAC
HOPE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6190
SMR RATING
1..100
5052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6413
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOPE's Valuation (26) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CAC (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew similarly to CAC’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's SMR Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (52) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

CAC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HOPE (45) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CAC’s stock grew similarly to HOPE’s over the last 12 months.

HOPE's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAC (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HOPE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CACHOPE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HOPE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWET217.755.79
+2.73%
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
ELFY45.500.71
+1.59%
ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF
FLKR72.250.56
+0.78%
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
KWIN25.590.03
+0.13%
KraneShares Wahed Alternative Inc IdxETF
DMB10.96-0.02
-0.18%
BNY Mellon Municipal

CAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAC has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAC jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAC
1D Price
Change %
CAC100%
+0.72%
SRCE - CAC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
FMBH - CAC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
PFIS - CAC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
FBIZ - CAC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
HOPE - CAC
79%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More