CAG
Price
$22.40
Change
+$0.09 (+0.40%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.17B
46 days until earnings call
UTZ
Price
$12.26
Change
-$0.03 (-0.24%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.5B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAG vs UTZ

Header iconCAG vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts CAG vs UTZBanner chart's image
Conagra Brands
Price$22.40
Change+$0.09 (+0.40%)
Volume$6.79M
Capitalization14.17B
Utz Brands
Price$12.26
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
Volume$967.78K
Capitalization1.5B
CAG vs UTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAG vs. UTZ commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a Hold and UTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CAG: $22.40 vs. UTZ: $12.26)
Brand notoriety: CAG and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAG: 100% vs. UTZ: 74%
Market capitalization -- CAG: $14.17B vs. UTZ: $1.5B
CAG [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14.17B. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAG is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UTZ is a better buy in the short-term than CAG.

Price Growth

CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.52% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.19% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAG($14.2B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.5B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than CAG: UTZ (81.45) vs CAG (14.48). CAG YTD gains are higher at: -16.980 vs. UTZ (-21.308). CAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. UTZ (99.2M). CAG has more cash in the bank: 61.5M vs. UTZ (52M). UTZ has less debt than CAG: UTZ (985M) vs CAG (9.07B). CAG has higher revenues than UTZ: CAG (12.2B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
CAGUTZCAG / UTZ
Capitalization14.2B1.5B946%
EBITDA1.88B99.2M1,895%
Gain YTD-16.980-21.30880%
P/E Ratio14.4881.4518%
Revenue12.2B1.44B848%
Total Cash61.5M52M118%
Total Debt9.07B985M921%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAG vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
CAG
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
8584
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6383
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAG's Valuation (7) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UTZ (47) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CAG (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as CAG (85) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as UTZ (83) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

CAG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (100) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAGUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JORNX18.870.01
+0.05%
Janus Henderson Global Select T
CRIMX21.53N/A
N/A
CRM Mid Cap Value Instl
SFDYX29.77N/A
N/A
SEI Mid-Cap Y (SIMT)
IVNCX21.63-0.08
-0.37%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class C
OAYMX151.66-0.87
-0.57%
Oakmark Advisor

CAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAG
1D Price
Change %
CAG100%
+0.40%
GIS - CAG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
CPB - CAG
71%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
KHC - CAG
69%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
FLO - CAG
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
MDLZ - CAG
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-0.24%
KHC - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
FLO - UTZ
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
CAG - UTZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CPB - UTZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
GIS - UTZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More