It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CAG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.33% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -10.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.79%.
CAG is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.
UTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
CAG | UTZ | CAG / UTZ | |
Capitalization | 14.2B | 1.5B | 946% |
EBITDA | 1.88B | 99.2M | 1,895% |
Gain YTD | 0.658 | -2.949 | -22% |
P/E Ratio | 14.48 | 81.45 | 18% |
Revenue | 12.2B | 1.44B | 848% |
Total Cash | 61.5M | 52M | 118% |
Total Debt | 9.07B | 985M | 921% |
CAG | UTZ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 82 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 9 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAG's Valuation (13) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (91) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
UTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CAG (69) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's SMR Rating (82) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as UTZ (90) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as UTZ (60) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Food Major Diversified industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (95) in the null industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.
CAG | UTZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 12 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago53% | 2 days ago65% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago71% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MGICX | 30.12 | 0.08 | +0.27% |
MFS International Intrinsic Value C | |||
KDHSX | 54.15 | 0.06 | +0.11% |
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend S | |||
KSDIX | 18.47 | N/A | N/A |
Keeley Small Cap Dividend Value I | |||
HSXAX | 8.60 | N/A | N/A |
Hartford Schroders Diversified Em Mkts A | |||
PEGEX | 21.69 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth R2 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.