It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAJPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHPQ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAJPY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HPQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CAJPY (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while HPQ (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -4.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +4.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +57.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +126.44%.
CAJPY is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
CAJPY | HPQ | CAJPY / HPQ | |
Capitalization | 26.1B | 29.6B | 88% |
EBITDA | 616B | 4.54B | 13,583% |
Gain YTD | 30.968 | 13.164 | 235% |
P/E Ratio | 14.06 | 8.91 | 158% |
Revenue | 4.15T | 53.1B | 7,806% |
Total Cash | 545B | 2.26B | 24,083% |
Total Debt | 663B | 10.9B | 6,083% |
CAJPY | HPQ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HPQ's Valuation (4) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as CAJPY (10) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as CAJPY (33) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's SMR Rating (44) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as CAJPY (69) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as HPQ (59) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew similarly to HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as CAJPY (56) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY | HPQ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago60% | 4 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago49% | 4 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago53% | 4 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% | 4 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 15 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago53% | 5 days ago56% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago53% | 4 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago52% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CPEAX | 23.30 | 0.31 | +1.35% |
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha A | |||
PICMX | 63.10 | 0.75 | +1.20% |
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth I | |||
MRSPX | 15.46 | 0.14 | +0.91% |
BlackRock Advantage SMID Cap R | |||
PRZIX | 34.21 | 0.12 | +0.35% |
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock I | |||
NUICX | 27.54 | -0.10 | -0.36% |
Nuveen International Dividend Growth C |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAJPY has been loosely correlated with SEKEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAJPY jumps, then SEKEY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CAJPY | 100% | +1.07% | ||
SEKEY - CAJPY | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
HPQ - CAJPY | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
LOGI - CAJPY | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
SMCI - CAJPY | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
SSYS - CAJPY | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
More |