Advertisement
CAJPY vs HPQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAJPY is a StrongBuy and HPQ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAJPY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileHPQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CAJPY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- HPQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAJPY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HPQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAJPY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
- HPQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CAJPY (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +4.18% price change this week, while HPQ (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +6.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +6.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAJPY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
HPQ is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (+6.08% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| CAJPY | HPQ | CAJPY / HPQ | |
| Capitalization | 25.6B | 22.4B | 114% |
| EBITDA | 538B | 4.19B | 12,843% |
| Gain YTD | -9.626 | -24.153 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.36 | 9.05 | 280% |
| Revenue | 4.55T | 54.7B | 8,322% |
| Total Cash | 722B | 2.87B | 25,148% |
| Total Debt | 1.12T | 10.8B | 10,352% |
CAJPY | HPQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HPQ's Valuation (1) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as CAJPY (6) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPQ (64) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's SMR Rating (5) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HPQ (42) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
HPQ's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as CAJPY (71) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry. This means that HPQ’s stock grew similarly to CAJPY’s over the last 12 months.
CAJPY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for HPQ (85) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that CAJPY’s stock grew significantly faster than HPQ’s over the last 12 months.
| CAJPY | HPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PWER | 33.95 | 1.56 | +4.82% |
| Macquarie Energy Transition ETF | |||
| NCV | 15.28 | 0.15 | +0.99% |
| Virtus Convertible & Income Fund | |||
| SPYC | 43.28 | 0.33 | +0.77% |
| Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF | |||
| BSCP | 20.68 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| LIAU | 271.89 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF | |||
CAJPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAJPY has been loosely correlated with SEKEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAJPY jumps, then SEKEY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAJPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAJPY | 100% | +1.66% | ||
| SEKEY - CAJPY | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| HPQ - CAJPY | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| LOGI - CAJPY | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| SMCI - CAJPY | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| SSYS - CAJPY | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
HPQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HPQ has been closely correlated with LOGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HPQ jumps, then LOGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HPQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPQ | 100% | -1.40% | ||
| LOGI - HPQ | 67% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| NTAP - HPQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| DELL - HPQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +5.83% | ||
| CRSR - HPQ | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| PSTG - HPQ | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.15% | ||
More | ||||