CAPS
Price
$1.67
Change
-$0.03 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.18M
52 days until earnings call
LOMA
Price
$11.36
Change
+$0.12 (+1.07%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.01B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAPS vs LOMA

Header iconCAPS vs LOMA Comparison
Open Charts CAPS vs LOMABanner chart's image
Capstone Holding
Price$1.67
Change-$0.03 (-1.76%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.18M
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
Price$11.36
Change+$0.12 (+1.07%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization1.01B
CAPS vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAPS vs. LOMA commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAPS is a Hold and LOMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CAPS: $1.67 vs. LOMA: $11.34)
Brand notoriety: CAPS and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAPS: 2% vs. LOMA: 53%
Market capitalization -- CAPS: $1.18M vs. LOMA: $1.01B
CAPS [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.18M. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAPS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the long-term than CAPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOMA’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LOMA’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.

Price Growth

CAPS (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.11% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAPS is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.63% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOMA($1.01B) has a higher market cap than CAPS($1.18M). CAPS has higher P/E ratio than LOMA: CAPS (28.09) vs LOMA (20.19). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.9B vs. CAPS (3.48M). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 20.9B vs. CAPS (68K). CAPS has less debt than LOMA: CAPS (31.2M) vs LOMA (97.9B). LOMA has higher revenues than CAPS: LOMA (136B) vs CAPS (59.9M).
CAPSLOMACAPS / LOMA
Capitalization1.18M1.01B0%
EBITDA3.48M39.9B0%
Gain YTDN/A-5.025-
P/E Ratio28.0920.19139%
Revenue59.9M136B0%
Total Cash68K20.9B0%
Total Debt31.2M97.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAPS vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
CAPS
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
9647
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
165
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAPS (69) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than CAPS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAPS (100) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than CAPS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's SMR Rating (47) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAPS (96) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAPS’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAPS (93) in the null industry. This means that LOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAPS’s over the last 12 months.

CAPS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMA (65) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that CAPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LOMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WFINX55.86N/A
N/A
Allspring Index C
PCAOX81.28N/A
N/A
Principal Capital Appreciation R3
RGOIX22.31N/A
N/A
RBC Global Opportunities I
ZVNIX43.06N/A
N/A
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
ADLVX28.87N/A
N/A
Adler Value Institutional

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
+0.89%
CRH - LOMA
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.75%
CX - LOMA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
KNF - LOMA
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
USLM - LOMA
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
EXP - LOMA
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More