CX
Price
$11.06
Change
-$0.02 (-0.18%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.96B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LOMA
Price
$9.43
Change
-$0.07 (-0.74%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CX vs LOMA

CX vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CX vs. LOMA commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CX is a Hold and LOMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CX: $11.08 vs. LOMA: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: CX: Notable vs. LOMA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CX: 60% vs. LOMA: 149%
Market capitalization -- CX: $15.96B vs. LOMA: $1.17B
CX [@Construction Materials] is valued at $15.96B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $64.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the long-term than LOMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CX (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.95% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was -11.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -6.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-6.49% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($16B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.17B). LOMA (37.45) and CX (36.87) have similar P/E ratio . CX YTD gains are higher at: -3.134 vs. LOMA (-26.641). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199B vs. CX (1.72B). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 46.8B vs. CX (654M). CX has less debt than LOMA: CX (7.46B) vs LOMA (309B). LOMA has higher revenues than CX: LOMA (850B) vs CX (17B).
CXLOMACX / LOMA
Capitalization16B1.17B1,373%
EBITDA1.72B199B1%
Gain YTD-3.134-26.64112%
P/E Ratio36.8737.4598%
Revenue17B850B2%
Total Cash654M46.8B1%
Total Debt7.46B309B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CX vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
CX
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6252
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6464
SMR RATING
1..100
8873
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6174
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
632
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (39). This means that LOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (64). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's SMR Rating (73) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (88). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (74). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

CX's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (32). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CXLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LOMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIOCX12.110.03
+0.25%
American Century International Opps C
SUWAX40.33N/A
N/A
DWS Core Equity A
EHSTX32.22N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value A
LOFLX17.30N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
VSMAX147.17N/A
N/A
Vanguard MStar Small Cap Index Admiral

CX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CX
1D Price
Change %
CX100%
-1.42%
CRH - CX
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
TTAM - CX
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
AMRZ - CX
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
MLM - CX
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
EXP - CX
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-1.86%
CX - LOMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CRH - LOMA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
AMRZ - LOMA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
TTAM - LOMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
More