CRH
Price
$97.15
Change
-$0.55 (-0.56%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
64.63B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LOMA
Price
$9.43
Change
-$0.07 (-0.74%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRH vs LOMA

CRH vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. LOMA commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a StrongBuy and LOMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CRH: $97.70 vs. LOMA: $9.50)
Brand notoriety: CRH and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 79% vs. LOMA: 149%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $64.63B vs. LOMA: $1.17B
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $64.63B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $64.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CRH and LOMA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.04% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was -11.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -6.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-6.49% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($64.6B) has a higher market cap than LOMA($1.17B). LOMA has higher P/E ratio than CRH: LOMA (37.45) vs CRH (17.16). CRH YTD gains are higher at: -21.153 vs. LOMA (-26.641). LOMA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199B vs. CRH (8.26B). LOMA has more cash in the bank: 46.8B vs. CRH (873M). CRH has less debt than LOMA: CRH (19.8B) vs LOMA (309B). LOMA has higher revenues than CRH: LOMA (850B) vs CRH (38.6B).
CRHLOMACRH / LOMA
Capitalization64.6B1.17B5,545%
EBITDA8.26B199B4%
Gain YTD-21.153-26.64179%
P/E Ratio17.1637.4546%
Revenue38.6B850B5%
Total Cash873M46.8B2%
Total Debt19.8B309B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1952
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3364
SMR RATING
1..100
5473
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7274
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8132
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (26). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (64). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's SMR Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (73). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Price Growth Rating (72) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (74). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRH (81). This means that LOMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LOMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMRI12.200.47
+4.01%
Lumexa Imaging Holdings Inc
PSMT179.821.89
+1.06%
PriceSmart
E54.78-0.34
-0.62%
ENI SpA
FENG1.53-0.04
-2.55%
Phoenix New Media Limited
QUIK12.56-0.52
-3.98%
QuickLogic Corp

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-1.86%
CX - LOMA
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CRH - LOMA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
AMRZ - LOMA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
TTAM - LOMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
More