CRH
Price
$83.75
Change
-$1.29 (-1.52%)
Updated
Sep 28 closing price
Capitalization
56.58B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LOMA
Price
$9.31
Change
-$0.04 (-0.43%)
Updated
Sep 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRH vs LOMA

CRH vs LOMA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. LOMA commentary
Sep 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Buy and LOMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH vs LOMA: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
LOMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6863
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5465
SMR RATING
1..100
5331
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8411
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMA's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (21). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as LOMA (65). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to LOMA’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's SMR Rating (31) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (53). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (78). This means that LOMA’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

LOMA's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRH (84). This means that LOMA’s stock grew significantly faster than CRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHLOMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2026
Stock price -- (CRH: $85.04 vs. LOMA: $9.35)
Brand notoriety: CRH and LOMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 112% vs. LOMA: 67%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $56.58B vs. LOMA: $1.16B
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $56.58B. LOMA’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $323.7K to $56.58B. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while LOMA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOMA is a better buy in the long-term than CRH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LOMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the short-term than LOMA.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while LOMA (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -4.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

LOMA is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-4.45% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LOMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLRO5.101.65
+47.83%
ClearOne Inc
EML24.390.29
+1.20%
Eastern Company
NP27.800.29
+1.05%
Neptune Insurance Holdings Inc
MTUS18.970.13
+0.69%
Metallus
ON75.65-1.55
-2.01%
ON Semiconductor Corp

CRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRH
1D Price
Change %
CRH100%
-1.52%
VMC - CRH
75%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
MLM - CRH
74%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
EXP - CRH
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
TTAM - CRH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
AMRZ - CRH
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More

LOMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMA has been loosely correlated with CX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMA jumps, then CX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMA
1D Price
Change %
LOMA100%
-0.43%
CX - LOMA
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
AMRZ - LOMA
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
CRH - LOMA
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
TTAM - LOMA
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
BCC - LOMA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More