CARD
Price
$2.41
Change
-$0.02 (-0.82%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
2.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMN
Price
$19.44
Change
-$0.70 (-3.48%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
3.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CARD vs SMN

CARD vs SMN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) vs. ProShares UltraShort Materials (SMN)

Key Takeaways

  • CARD is a -3x inverse leveraged exchange-traded note (ETN) targeting the auto industry, while SMN is a -2x inverse leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) focused on the broader materials sector.
  • Both products use derivatives to deliver daily inverse multiples of their benchmarks, making them suitable for short-term tactical positioning rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies.
  • CARD offers higher leverage (-3x) and narrower thematic exposure to automobiles and components, whereas SMN provides moderate leverage (-2x) across chemicals, metals, mining, and related industries.
  • Expense structures differ significantly: SMN carries a net expense ratio of 0.95% (after waivers), while CARD, as an ETN, typically embeds issuer credit and financing costs within its pricing.
  • These ETFs serve distinct hedging or bearish objectives, with CARD emphasizing auto-sector cyclicality and SMN addressing materials-sector sensitivity to commodity prices and industrial demand.
  • Structural differences in leverage, underlying index breadth, and product type (ETN versus ETF) drive divergent risk profiles, liquidity characteristics, and potential tracking behaviors over market cycles.

Introduction

Investors seeking inverse exposure to cyclical sectors often evaluate specialized leveraged products like CARD and SMN to hedge equity portfolios or express tactical bearish views. These two funds do not compete directly for the same benchmark but offer complementary strategies within economically sensitive areas: CARD targets the auto industry while SMN covers the wider materials sector. Comparing them helps investors understand trade-offs in leverage magnitude, sector granularity, and product structure when navigating periods of sector rotation or macroeconomic uncertainty.

Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) Overview

CARD is an exchange-traded note issued by BMO that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of -3 times the performance of the Prime Auto Industry Index. The underlying index comprises approximately 23 constituents focused on automobiles and auto components. As an ETN, CARD does not hold underlying securities but instead represents an unsecured debt obligation of the issuer, exposing investors to issuer credit risk in addition to market and leverage risks. The product resets leverage daily and is designed for short-term use. No traditional holdings list exists; exposure is achieved through the note’s payoff structure tied to the index. Distinguishing features include its high leverage multiple and narrow focus on the auto supply chain, which amplifies sensitivity to vehicle production cycles, consumer spending, and supply-chain disruptions.

ProShares UltraShort Materials (SMN) Overview

SMN is an exchange-traded fund that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of -2 times the performance of the S&P Materials Select Sector Index. The benchmark includes 26 companies spanning chemicals, construction materials, containers and packaging, metals and mining, and paper and forest products. SMN achieves its inverse exposure primarily through total return swaps with multiple counterparties rather than direct short positions in equities. The fund’s net expense ratio stands at 0.95% after contractual waivers, with a higher gross ratio before waivers. As a traditional ETF, it offers exchange-traded liquidity without issuer credit risk beyond the swaps. Key characteristics include daily rebalancing via derivatives, quarterly distributions, and options availability. Its broader sector scope provides diversification within materials compared with single-industry products.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within cyclical, economically sensitive segments of the equity market. The auto industry faces ongoing pressures from interest-rate environments affecting vehicle financing, shifts toward electric vehicles, and global supply-chain dynamics. The materials sector responds to commodity price fluctuations, industrial production levels, construction activity, and global trade patterns. Macro drivers such as Federal Reserve policy, inflation trends, and manufacturing data influence capital flows into or out of these areas. Regulatory developments around emissions standards and trade tariffs can also create volatility. These sectors typically exhibit higher beta to economic growth expectations, making inverse products relevant during anticipated slowdowns or sector-specific headwinds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, leveraged inverse products like CARD and SMN have displayed amplified volatility relative to their benchmarks, with returns diverging from simple multiples due to daily reset mechanics and compounding effects. CARD’s higher leverage and narrower auto focus tend to produce sharper moves during periods of auto-industry stress or recovery, such as earnings seasons for major manufacturers. SMN’s -2x materials exposure has historically reflected broader commodity and industrial trends, offering somewhat moderated daily swings compared with -3x products. Relative positioning depends on whether investors anticipate weakness concentrated in autos versus the wider materials complex, with both vehicles sensitive to interest-rate expectations and global growth signals.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, SMN’s ETF wrapper, lower net expense ratio after waivers, and broader sector diversification within materials may receive a modest probabilistic preference from Tickeron’s AI for investors seeking inverse exposure in the current environment. CARD’s higher leverage and concentrated auto focus introduce greater potential volatility and issuer-specific considerations as an ETN, which could suit more aggressive, short-horizon tactical views but carry elevated structural complexity.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CARD vs. SMN commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CARD is a Hold and SMN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMN has more net assets: 3.92M vs. CARD (2.57M). CARD has a higher annual dividend yield than SMN: CARD (-10.409) vs SMN (-25.454). CARD was incepted earlier than SMN: CARD (3 years) vs SMN (19 years).
CARDSMNCARD / SMN
Gain YTD-10.409-25.45441%
Net Assets2.57M3.92M66%
Total Expense RatioN/A0.95-
TurnoverN/AN/A-
YieldN/A3.60-
Fund Existence3 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CARDSMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CARD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTWO52.632.43
+4.84%
Q2 Holdings
NCSM44.44N/A
N/A
NCS Multistage Holdings
FDMT11.60N/A
N/A
4D Molecular Therapeutics
CDIO2.01N/A
N/A
Cardio Diagnostics Holdings Inc.
SQM72.70-1.52
-2.05%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA