It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CASY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CASY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CASY (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +6.43% price change this week, while RUSHB (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -2.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.86%.
CASY is expected to report earnings on Sep 14, 2026.
RUSHB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+0.32% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| CASY | RUSHB | CASY / RUSHB | |
| Capitalization | 31.8B | 5.86B | 543% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 640M | 232% |
| Gain YTD | 55.687 | 35.419 | 157% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.84 | 22.89 | 196% |
| Revenue | 17.6B | 7.27B | 242% |
| Total Cash | 523M | 240M | 218% |
| Total Debt | 2.91B | 1.44B | 202% |
CASY | RUSHB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHB's Valuation (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CASY (96) in the Food Retail industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew significantly faster than CASY’s over the last 12 months.
CASY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as RUSHB (7) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
CASY's SMR Rating (46) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as RUSHB (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CASY’s stock grew similarly to RUSHB’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CASY (44) in the Food Retail industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHB's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CASY (29) in the Food Retail industry. This means that RUSHB’s stock grew similarly to CASY’s over the last 12 months.
| CASY | RUSHB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 19 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 12 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 63% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ERET | 29.06 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Environmentally Aware Rl Est ETF | |||
| YLDW | 25.52 | -0.11 | -0.45% |
| Westwood Enhanced Income Opportunity ETF | |||
| BUI | 28.08 | -0.19 | -0.67% |
| BlackRock Utilities Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust | |||
| IWM | 293.48 | -2.51 | -0.85% |
| iShares Russell 2000 ETF | |||
| BCV | 24.75 | -0.30 | -1.20% |
| Bancroft Fund Ltd | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that CASY and RUSHB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CASY and RUSHB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CASY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASY | 100% | +4.79% | ||
| RUSHB - CASY | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| CPRT - CASY | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
| ACVA - CASY | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| HNST - CASY | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.74% | ||
| RUSHA - CASY | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHB has been closely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHB jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHB | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| RUSHA - RUSHB | 83% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ONEW - RUSHB | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.68% | ||
| HVT - RUSHB | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| HZO - RUSHB | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| RH - RUSHB | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
More | ||||