Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CATH vs RECS
CATH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts CATH vs RECS
CATH vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CATH vs. RECS commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATH is a StrongBuy and RECS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.99B vs. CATH (1.35B). CATH (10.882) and RECS (10.651) have matching annual dividend yield . CATH was incepted earlier than RECS: CATH (10 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CATH (0.29). RECS has a higher turnover CATH (9.79) vs CATH (9.79).
| CATH | RECS | CATH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 10.882 | 10.651 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 5.99B | 23% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.15 | 193% |
| Turnover | 9.79 | 32.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 0.75 | 0.71 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CATH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CATH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATH has been loosely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CATH jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CATH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATH | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| FBIN - CATH | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NVDA - CATH | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| LRCX - CATH | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| LNC - CATH | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| CE - CATH | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||