Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CATH vs RECS
CATH vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts CATH vs RECS
CATH vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CATH vs. RECS commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATH is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 5.8B vs. CATH (1.27B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than CATH: RECS (6.489) vs CATH (6.113). CATH was incepted earlier than RECS: CATH (10 years) vs RECS (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CATH (0.29). RECS has a higher turnover CATH (9.79) vs CATH (9.79).
| CATH | RECS | CATH / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.113 | 6.489 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 5.8B | 22% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.15 | 193% |
| Turnover | 9.79 | 32.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 0.77 | 0.75 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CATH | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 10 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CATH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATH has been loosely correlated with FBIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CATH jumps, then FBIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CATH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATH | 100% | N/A | ||
| FBIN - CATH | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| NVDA - CATH | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LRCX - CATH | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LNC - CATH | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| CE - CATH | 62% Loosely correlated | +5.49% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.55% | ||
More | ||||