Advertisement
CATH vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATH is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CATH | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HNCCX | 21.07 | 0.24 | +1.15% |
| Hartford International Growth C | |||
| PWJCX | 32.92 | 0.27 | +0.83% |
| PGIM Jennison International Opps C | |||
| CIAOX | 54.55 | 0.28 | +0.52% |
| Capital Advisors Growth Investor | |||
| RIDCX | 28.35 | 0.14 | +0.50% |
| American Funds Income Fd of Amer R-3 | |||
| NINCX | 26.71 | 0.08 | +0.30% |
| Neuberger Intrinsic Value C | |||
CATH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CATH has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CATH jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CATH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CATH | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| NVDA - CATH | 66% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| FBIN - CATH | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| IVZ - CATH | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| MS - CATH | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.25% | ||
| LRCX - CATH | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 90% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 87% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 84% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| ONTO - LRCX | 81% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
More | ||||