CATY
Price
$47.45
Change
-$0.49 (-1.02%)
Updated
Sep 30, 02:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.36B
27 days until earnings call
LRCDF
Price
$24.13
Change
-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CATY vs LRCDF

Header iconCATY vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts CATY vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
Cathay General Ban
Price$47.45
Change-$0.49 (-1.02%)
Volume$200
Capitalization3.36B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$24.13
Change-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Volume$62.55K
Capitalization1.05B
CATY vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CATY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CATY vs. LRCDF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CATY is a Buy and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CATY: $47.94 vs. LRCDF: $22.45)
Brand notoriety: CATY and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CATY: 63% vs. LRCDF: 71%
Market capitalization -- CATY: $3.36B vs. LRCDF: $1.05B
CATY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.36B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CATY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CATY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CATY is a better buy in the long-term than LRCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CATY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CATY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the short-term than CATY.

Price Growth

CATY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.04% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

CATY is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.67% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CATY($3.36B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.05B). CATY has higher P/E ratio than LRCDF: CATY (11.58) vs LRCDF (10.27). LRCDF YTD gains are higher at: 12.419 vs. CATY (2.938). CATY has less debt than LRCDF: CATY (583M) vs LRCDF (15.6B). LRCDF has higher revenues than CATY: LRCDF (975M) vs CATY (760M).
CATYLRCDFCATY / LRCDF
Capitalization3.36B1.05B321%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.93812.41924%
P/E Ratio11.5810.27113%
Revenue760M975M78%
Total Cash175MN/A-
Total Debt583M15.6B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CATY vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
CATY
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5628
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3091
SMR RATING
1..100
1414
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3448
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
12n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CATY (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRCDF (91) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LRCDF (14) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CATY (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to CATY’s over the last 12 months.

CATY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LRCDF (48) in the null industry. This means that CATY’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CATYLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CATY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTSIX97.05N/A
N/A
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small Cap I
PKSAX51.17N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core A
SRUIX15.41N/A
N/A
Meeder Spectrum Institutional
GWGZX19.52N/A
N/A
AMG GW&K Small Mid Cap Core Z
GSAFX28.55N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
-6.96%
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
More