CAVA
Price
$86.52
Change
+$3.81 (+4.61%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.01B
46 days until earnings call
GGGSY
Price
$7.92
Change
-$1.44 (-15.38%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs GGGSY

Header iconCAVA vs GGGSY Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs GGGSYBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$86.52
Change+$3.81 (+4.61%)
Volume$4.95M
Capitalization10.01B
Greggs
Price$7.92
Change-$1.44 (-15.38%)
Volume$7.4K
Capitalization2.34B
CAVA vs GGGSY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. GGGSY commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a StrongBuy and GGGSY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $86.52 vs. GGGSY: $7.92)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and GGGSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 128% vs. GGGSY: 1190%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $10.01B vs. GGGSY: $2.34B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $10.01B. GGGSY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGGSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GGGSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSY is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGGSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GGGSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSY is a better buy in the short-term than CAVA.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +11.39% price change this week, while GGGSY (@Restaurants) price change was -8.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($10B) has a higher market cap than GGGSY($2.34B). CAVA has higher P/E ratio than GGGSY: CAVA (72.10) vs GGGSY (11.55). GGGSY YTD gains are higher at: -19.422 vs. CAVA (-23.298). GGGSY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 358M vs. CAVA (132M). GGGSY has higher revenues than CAVA: GGGSY (2.01B) vs CAVA (1.04B).
CAVAGGGSYCAVA / GGGSY
Capitalization10B2.34B427%
EBITDA132M358M37%
Gain YTD-23.298-19.422120%
P/E Ratio72.1011.55624%
Revenue1.04B2.01B51%
Total Cash369MN/A-
Total Debt412MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVAGGGSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPMJX5.920.03
+0.49%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus R
TOLIX16.57N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Inst
JACCX38.96N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Forty C
PWDCX10.00N/A
N/A
Donoghue Forlines Dividend C
CBHMX8.74N/A
N/A
Victory Market Neutral Income Member

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+4.61%
SG - CAVA
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
SHAK - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
KRUS - CAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
EAT - CAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
WING - CAVA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
More

GGGSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSY and FCUL have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSY and FCUL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSY
1D Price
Change %
GGGSY100%
-15.38%
FCUL - GGGSY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPHIF - GGGSY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHSN - GGGSY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
CAVA - GGGSY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+4.61%
THCH - GGGSY
-3%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
More