CAVA
Price
$88.02
Change
+$1.76 (+2.04%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.18B
24 days until earnings call
GGGSY
Price
$7.79
Change
-$0.18 (-2.26%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.37B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAVA vs GGGSY

Header iconCAVA vs GGGSY Comparison
Open Charts CAVA vs GGGSYBanner chart's image
CAVA Group
Price$88.02
Change+$1.76 (+2.04%)
Volume$2.13M
Capitalization10.18B
Greggs
Price$7.79
Change-$0.18 (-2.26%)
Volume$232
Capitalization2.37B
CAVA vs GGGSY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAVA vs. GGGSY commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAVA is a Hold and GGGSY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CAVA: $88.02 vs. GGGSY: $7.80)
Brand notoriety: CAVA and GGGSY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAVA: 54% vs. GGGSY: 26%
Market capitalization -- CAVA: $10.18B vs. GGGSY: $2.37B
CAVA [@Restaurants] is valued at $10.18B. GGGSY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGGSY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAVA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GGGSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSY is a better buy in the long-term than CAVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGGSY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GGGSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAVA is a better buy in the short-term than GGGSY.

Price Growth

CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.78% price change this week, while GGGSY (@Restaurants) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAVA is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.12% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAVA($10.2B) has a higher market cap than GGGSY($2.37B). CAVA has higher P/E ratio than GGGSY: CAVA (73.35) vs GGGSY (11.51). GGGSY YTD gains are higher at: -20.694 vs. CAVA (-21.968). GGGSY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 358M vs. CAVA (132M). GGGSY has higher revenues than CAVA: GGGSY (2.01B) vs CAVA (1.04B).
CAVAGGGSYCAVA / GGGSY
Capitalization10.2B2.37B430%
EBITDA132M358M37%
Gain YTD-21.968-20.694106%
P/E Ratio73.3511.51637%
Revenue1.04B2.01B51%
Total Cash369MN/A-
Total Debt412MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAVAGGGSY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAFGX84.300.28
+0.33%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F2
HIBSX103.98N/A
N/A
Hartford Stock HLS IB
CLFFX21.05N/A
N/A
Clifford Capital Partners Investor
CRQSX13.80N/A
N/A
Catholic Rspnsbl Invst Equity Idx Ins
GSLIX16.91N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Instl

CAVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with SG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then SG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAVA
1D Price
Change %
CAVA100%
+2.04%
SG - CAVA
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.43%
SHAK - CAVA
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.74%
KRUS - CAVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
EAT - CAVA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
CAKE - CAVA
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
More

GGGSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSY and FCUL have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSY and FCUL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSY
1D Price
Change %
GGGSY100%
-2.32%
FCUL - GGGSY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPHIF - GGGSY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHSN - GGGSY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-5.89%
CAVA - GGGSY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
THCH - GGGSY
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More