Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBAIX vs RLBFX
CBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBAIX vs RLBFX
CBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBAIX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAIX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. CBAIX (1.46B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBAIX: RLBFX (2.05) vs CBAIX (1.48). CBAIX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBAIX (28 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CBAIX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CBAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBAIX: RLBFX (250) vs CBAIX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.94 vs. CBAIX (6.67). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.73 vs. CBAIX (24.53).
| CBAIX | RLBFX | CBAIX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.856 | 10.287 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 283B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 2.05 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 12.94 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.65 | 46.32 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.53 | 35.73 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.64 | 86.86 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement