Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBAIX vs RLBFX
CBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBAIX vs RLBFX
CBAIX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBAIX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBAIX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. CBAIX (1.46B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBAIX: RLBFX (2.03) vs CBAIX (1.47). CBAIX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBAIX (28 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CBAIX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CBAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. RLBFX (50.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBAIX: RLBFX (250) vs CBAIX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. CBAIX (1.82). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. CBAIX (21.24).
| CBAIX | RLBFX | CBAIX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.757 | 8.705 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 285B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 2.03 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.82 | 6.98 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.72 | 42.70 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.24 | 33.18 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.15 | 87.98 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement