Advertisement
CBOE vs LULU
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBOE is a Buy and LULU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBOE’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLULU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBOE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- LULU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBOE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LULU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBOE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LULU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CBOE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.81% price change this week, while LULU (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -3.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.49%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBOE is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
LULU is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.28% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Apparel/Footwear Retail (-2.71% weekly)Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
| CBOE | LULU | CBOE / LULU | |
| Capitalization | 19.4B | 48.5B | 40% |
| EBITDA | 1.27B | 2.59B | 49% |
| Gain YTD | 18.876 | -18.736 | -101% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.77 | 31.57 | 82% |
| Revenue | 3.77B | 9.62B | 39% |
| Total Cash | 601M | 2.24B | 27% |
| Total Debt | 1.61B | 1.4B | 115% |
CBOE | LULU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBOE's Valuation (37) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LULU (81) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LULU’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for LULU (73) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew significantly faster than LULU’s over the last 12 months.
LULU's SMR Rating (22) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as CBOE (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that LULU’s stock grew similarly to CBOE’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LULU (49) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to LULU’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LULU (67) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that CBOE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LULU’s over the last 12 months.
| CBOE | LULU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 40% | 24 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
CBOE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBOE has been loosely correlated with CME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBOE jumps, then CME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBOE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBOE | 100% | +1.38% | ||
| CME - CBOE | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ICE - CBOE | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| MKTX - CBOE | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| MDBH - CBOE | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| ARBK - CBOE | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
More | ||||
LULU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LULU has been loosely correlated with BKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LULU jumps, then BKE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LULU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LULU | 100% | -3.03% | ||
| BKE - LULU | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| GCO - LULU | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| VSCO - LULU | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| GAP - LULU | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| ZUMZ - LULU | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.56% | ||
More | ||||