Exchange operators are often treated as barometers of market activity, yet CBOE and CME follow distinct business paths even as they compete for similar trading flows. This stock comparison is relevant for investors weighing growth against stability within the financial-infrastructure sector, as well as traders assessing relative performance and market positioning. Cboe Global Markets derives much of its value from proprietary options and market data, while CME Group anchors the world's largest futures and derivatives clearing network. Understanding how these two franchises differ in momentum, risk factors, and catalysts can help clarify which profile may align better with current conditions.
Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) operates a diversified exchange business spanning options, equities, foreign exchange, digital assets, and a growing market-data segment. Its flagship SPX options complex remains the primary growth engine. In its most recent reported quarter, net revenue rose 29% year over year (YoY) to roughly $728.9 million, with derivatives revenue up 32% and average daily volume (ADV) in proprietary SPX options climbing about 34% to a record. Data Vantage revenue also expanded, reaching approximately $181.3 million.
Despite these results, CBOE shares have been volatile in recent weeks. After touching a 52-week high earlier in the year, the stock pulled back sharply, losing roughly a quarter of its value over a recent one-month stretch. Sentiment has been pressured by valuation compression, concerns over market-share erosion, and expectations that lower market volatility could reduce trading activity. Competitive threats from prediction markets and perpetual futures have added to investor unease. In response, the company is streamlining operations, including the planned sale of certain international units and a workforce realignment, while reinvesting in high-growth areas such as prediction markets, tokenized products, and expanded clearing services.
CME Group (CME) is the world's largest derivatives marketplace, providing futures and options trading and clearing across interest rates, equities, foreign exchange, energy, agriculture, and metals. The company reported record first-half results, including record revenue of $1.9 billion in the first quarter, up 14% YoY, and an adjusted operating margin of roughly 72.8%. Clearing and transaction fee revenue rose 15%, while market data revenue climbed 15% to $224 million, marking more than 30 consecutive quarters of growth. Open interest ended the period up 11% year over year.
In the second quarter, CME posted adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $2.99, modestly above consensus, alongside average daily volume of 29.8 million contracts, the third-highest on record. The company has also pursued product innovation, including 24/7 crypto trading, new index-based sports futures, and AI-compute futures tied to graphics processing unit (GPU) pricing. Like CBOE, CME shares were caught in the exchange-sector selloff tied to perpetual-futures competition, but the stock has shown greater resilience, with a lower beta and a more consistent recovery in recent weeks.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a focused selection of AI-powered trading bots from a much larger library of hundreds of automated strategies that collectively trade thousands of tickers. Because market conditions shift constantly, only the bots judged most suitable for the current environment earn a place in this section. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, statistics, and set of tickers it trades, so no two are alike. Traders exploring a CBOE and CME stock comparison can browse these vetted strategies to see how algorithmic approaches are positioning across exchange-sector names. To review the currently featured bots and their performance metrics, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
The clearest contrast between these two franchises is one of scale and focus. CME operates a vast, deeply entrenched futures-and-clearing ecosystem with dominant positions in interest rates and commodities, generating substantial recurring revenue and capital-efficiency savings for clients. CBOE is more concentrated in proprietary options and market data, which gives it higher growth potential but also greater sensitivity to volatility trends and competitive encroachment.
Growth dynamics also differ. CBOE's recent double-digit revenue growth outpaces CME's, yet CME's earnings profile is more consistent, backed by record volume and a 72.8% adjusted operating margin. On risk, both face the same structural threat from prediction markets and perpetual futures, but the impact has been asymmetric: CBOE's sharper drawdown reflects greater exposure to options-market competition and valuation reset. CME's lower beta and steadier recovery suggest more defensive market positioning. Sector exposure adds another layer—both benefit from periods of elevated volatility, but CBOE's earnings are more directly levered to options volumes, while CME diversifies across rates, energy, metals, and agricultural derivatives.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CME at present. The signal is driven less by headline growth and more by trend consistency, stability, and relative positioning. CME combines record results, a more diversified revenue base, a lower beta, and a steadier recovery from the sector-wide selloff, all of which align with a preference for reduced volatility and durable catalysts. CBOE retains a stronger growth trajectory and a comparatively attractive valuation, but its recent drawdown and greater competitive sensitivity introduce more uncertainty. In probabilistic terms, CME currently presents the more consistent risk-adjusted profile, though the relative balance could shift if options volatility re-accelerates.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
CBOE | CME | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBOE's Valuation (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CME (95). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to CME’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CME (47). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to CME’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's SMR Rating (37) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CME (54). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to CME’s over the last 12 months.
CBOE's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CME (56). This means that CBOE’s stock grew similarly to CME’s over the last 12 months.
CME's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as CBOE (78). This means that CME’s stock grew similarly to CBOE’s over the last 12 months.
| CBOE | CME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 19 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 39% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBOE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CME’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBOE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CME’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBOE (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +3.60% price change this week, while CME (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -1.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.56%.
CBOE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
CME is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBOE has been loosely correlated with CME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBOE jumps, then CME could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBOE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBOE | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| CME - CBOE | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| MKTX - CBOE | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| TW - CBOE | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.44% | ||
| ICE - CBOE | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ARBK - CBOE | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CME has been loosely correlated with ICE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CME jumps, then ICE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CME | 100% | +1.19% | ||
| ICE - CME | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| TW - CME | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| MKTX - CME | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| NDAQ - CME | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| MSCI - CME | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||