CBRE Group and CoStar Group represent pivotal players in commercial real estate (CRE), with CBRE leading in services and brokerage while CoStar dominates data, analytics, and marketplaces. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning amid CRE stabilization and tech intersections like data centers. Traders seeking momentum in real estate recovery or investors eyeing sector diversification will find value in understanding their contrasting business models, performance trends, and growth catalysts in the current environment.
CBRE Group, the world's largest CRE services firm, provides brokerage, property management, and investment services across 100+ countries. In recent weeks, its stock has shown resilience, trading around $148 with YTD gains of 7.77% and a 52-week range of $118.58–$174.27. Q1 2026 earnings highlighted $10.53 billion in revenue, surpassing expectations, fueled by infrastructure services and data center deals. A partnership with Meta Platforms to train fiber technicians underscores AI-related tailwinds. Sentiment has improved on leasing recovery and capital markets activity, with analysts maintaining Outperform ratings and a $178 price target.
CoStar Group leads in CRE information, analytics, and online marketplaces, serving a $100 billion+ addressable market. Its shares recently hovered near $36, within a 52-week range of $34.75–$97.43, reflecting YTD gains of 45.81% despite sharp pullbacks. Recent market activity saw an 8.3% drop following a $1.5 billion buyback pledge and strategic refocus on core CRE amid activist pressures. Q4 2025 results beat estimates with 27% revenue growth to $900 million, but net new sales lagged. Upcoming Q1 earnings loom, with mixed analyst views and a $59.84 target signaling potential rebound but elevated risks from residential investments.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top performers from 351 AI trading bots that scan thousands of tickers for optimal trades. These bots employ diverse strategies—spanning short-term momentum, long-term trends, volatility plays, and sector rotations in areas like semiconductors, energy, and finance—with stats including annualized returns up to triple digits, win rates often above 60%, profit factors exceeding 2.0, and average trade durations from hours to weeks. None currently feature CBRE or CSGP, but the dynamic rankings adapt to market shifts. Explore these bots to identify strategies aligning with current conditions and enhance your trading edge.
CBRE's brokerage and services model thrives on transaction volumes, contrasting CoStar's subscription-based analytics and marketplaces, which offer recurring revenue but sensitivity to CRE data demand. Growth drivers diverge: CBRE leverages data center booms and AI infrastructure, while CoStar emphasizes core CRE refocus post-residential setbacks. Recent momentum favors CBRE's steady YTD climb and earnings beats over CoStar's volatility and post-buyback dip. Risk factors include CRE cyclicality for both, but CoStar faces higher execution risks from capital allocation scrutiny; CBRE's beta of 1.35 signals greater market linkage versus CoStar's 0.92. Sector exposure centers on CRE, yet CBRE's global footprint provides diversification. Market sentiment tilts toward CBRE's catalysts amid real estate uptick.
Tickeron's AI currently favors CBRE over CSGP, citing superior trend consistency, data center catalysts, and relative stability in recent market activity. CBRE's earnings momentum and infrastructure positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, though CoStar's buyback and analytics moat warrant monitoring post-earnings.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBRE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while CSGP (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.31%.
CBRE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
CSGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CBRE | CSGP | CBRE / CSGP | |
| Capitalization | 38.1B | 11.9B | 320% |
| EBITDA | 2B | 272M | 734% |
| Gain YTD | -19.180 | -56.544 | 34% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.67 | 417.43 | 7% |
| Revenue | 42.2B | 3.41B | 1,237% |
| Total Cash | 1.66B | 1.22B | 137% |
| Total Debt | 10.4B | 1.19B | 874% |
CBRE | CSGP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBRE's Valuation (86) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSGP (91) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CBRE's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (65) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CSGP's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBRE (79) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBRE’s over the last 12 months.
| CBRE | CSGP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | 14 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% |