This stock comparison examines CSGP and NMRK, two key players in the real estate services sector amid evolving CRE market dynamics. Both companies provide essential services in a sector sensitive to interest rates, economic shifts, and leasing trends. Traders seeking momentum opportunities and investors eyeing long-term positioning in commercial property data, brokerage, and analytics will find value in understanding their relative performance, growth drivers, and risk profiles. With recent strategic moves and upcoming earnings, this analysis highlights contrasts in scale, valuation, and market sentiment for informed decision-making in today's environment.
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) operates a leading platform for CRE data, analytics, and marketplaces, serving brokers, owners, and investors with comprehensive property intelligence. In recent market activity, CSGP shares have traded near 52-week lows around $36, reflecting a year-to-date gain but pressured by broader declines over the past year. Sentiment has been influenced by anticipation for Q1 earnings, where analysts project 22% revenue growth to approximately $3.25 billion trailing twelve months (TTM), alongside a $1.5 billion share buyback program signaling management confidence. However, execution risks in core operations and a refocus away from certain ventures have contributed to recent share price dips of over 8% following announcements. Key metrics include a market cap of $15.4 billion, TTM EPS of $0.02, and high P/E reflecting growth expectations.
Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) delivers commercial real estate services, including brokerage, leasing, and investment management, targeting institutional and corporate clients globally. Shares have maintained stability around $16 in recent weeks, supported by positive year-to-date and one-year returns amid a volatile sector. Performance drivers include Q4 2025 earnings that beat EPS estimates at $0.68, with TTM revenue near $3.3 billion. Recent developments, such as amending its revolving credit facility to $900 million (expandable to $1.1 billion), bolster liquidity and underscore operational resilience. Trading between 52-week bounds of $10.20 and $19.83, NMRK benefits from a more grounded valuation with a P/E of 23.6 and $3 billion market cap, though exposed to CRE cyclicality.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current market conditions earn a spot here, featuring 25 bots with diverse strategies—from short-term scalping to longer holds in sectors like semiconductors, energy, and finance. Performance stats impress: annualized returns ranging 15% to 168%, win rates 48% to 88%, profit factors 1.5 to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 21.5. These bots offer real-time signals, virtual risk management, and customizable portfolios. Explore these high-conviction options to enhance your trading edge in dynamic markets.
CSGP and NMRK share CRE sector exposure but diverge in business models: CSGP emphasizes proprietary data platforms for recurring subscriptions, fostering higher margins, while NMRK relies on transaction-based brokerage, tying growth to deal volume. Scale favors CSGP with fivefold larger market cap and steadier revenue visibility, versus NMRK's nimbler but cyclical profile. Recent momentum shows NMRK outperforming with positive returns amid stability, contrasting CSGP's dips despite growth catalysts. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity for both, but CSGP faces execution hurdles while NMRK contends with volume fluctuations. Market sentiment leans value toward NMRK's lower multiples, balanced by CSGP's dominant positioning.
Tickeron’s AI tools, analyzing trend consistency, stability, and catalysts, currently favor NMRK over CSGP. NMRK demonstrates superior relative momentum with steady gains and attractive valuation in recent market activity, alongside liquidity enhancements. While CSGP offers scale and buyback support, its higher volatility and execution concerns temper short-term appeal. This probabilistic edge aligns with observable positioning for potential outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSGP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSGP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -3.10% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.60%.
CSGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CSGP | NMRK | CSGP / NMRK | |
| Capitalization | 13.4B | 2.7B | 497% |
| EBITDA | 272M | 460M | 59% |
| Gain YTD | -51.160 | -11.933 | 429% |
| P/E Ratio | 469.14 | 18.74 | 2,503% |
| Revenue | 3.41B | 3.48B | 98% |
| Total Cash | 1.22B | 212M | 573% |
| Total Debt | 1.19B | 2.46B | 48% |
CSGP | NMRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (92) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (65) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CSGP's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for NMRK (88) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew significantly faster than NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| CSGP | NMRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGP has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGP jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGP | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| CIGI - CSGP | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CBRE - CSGP | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| NMRK - CSGP | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| JLL - CSGP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| MMI - CSGP | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMRK | 100% | +2.50% | ||
| CBRE - NMRK | 83% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| CWK - NMRK | 83% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| JLL - NMRK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CIGI - NMRK | 68% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MMI - NMRK | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||