CSGP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 27 of 45 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CSGP as a result. In 47 of 87 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CSGP just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where CSGP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 56%.
Following a +7.31% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CSGP advanced for three days, in 173 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for CSGP moved out of overbought territory on October 19, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 21 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 13 of the 21 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 62%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 6 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 10-day moving average for CSGP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CSGP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
CSGP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CSGP entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. CSGP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 93 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.625) is normal, around the industry mean (2.056). P/E Ratio (176.722) is within average values for comparable stocks, (52.215). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.099) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.105) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.566) is also within normal values, averaging (5.676).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CSGP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
The RSI Indicator for JLL moved out of oversold territory on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 30 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 23 of the 30 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 77%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 56 cases where JLL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on JLL as a result. In 52 of 73 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for JLL just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where JLL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
JLL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The 10-day moving average for JLL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 9 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where JLL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
The Aroon Indicator for JLL entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. JLL’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 70 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. JLL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 80 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.866) is normal, around the industry mean (2.056). P/E Ratio (14.241) is within average values for comparable stocks, (52.215). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.650) is also within normal values, averaging (0.683). Dividend Yield (0.006) settles around the average of (0.105) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.593) is also within normal values, averaging (5.676).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
CSGP | JLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JLL's Valuation (80) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (93) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's SMR Rating (88) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (89) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (58) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CSGP's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as JLL (85) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
| CSGP | JLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSGP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while JLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSGP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +8.90% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -3.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.23%.
CSGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
JLL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGP has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGP jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSGP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGP | 100% | -1.55% | ||
| CIGI - CSGP | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| CBRE - CSGP | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| MMI - CSGP | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| NMRK - CSGP | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.76% | ||
| JLL - CSGP | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JLL | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| CBRE - JLL | 88% Closely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| CWK - JLL | 82% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| MMI - JLL | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| COMP - JLL | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| AGNT - JLL | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
More | ||||