This comparison examines CSGP and JLL, two prominent players in real estate services, amid evolving market dynamics in commercial property data and transactions. Investors tracking sector recovery, technology-driven analytics, or service-oriented growth may find value in their relative performance. With similar market caps and exposure to office, industrial, and multifamily segments, these stocks offer insights into contrasting business models—data platforms versus hands-on services. Recent weeks have shown divergent price behaviors, reflecting broader sentiment shifts in real estate amid interest rate expectations and economic resilience.
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) is a leading provider of commercial real estate information, analytics, and online marketplaces, including platforms like LoopNet and Apartments.com. Its subscription-based model delivers data on leasing, sales, and market trends to brokers, owners, and investors. In recent market activity, CSGP shares have trended lower, approaching the 52-week low of $34.75 from a high of $97.43, with a roughly 56% decline over the past year. Trading around $36, the stock recently fell about 8% following a $1.5 billion share buyback announcement and a strategic refocus on core operations. Activist pressures and anticipation for Q1 earnings have influenced sentiment, alongside moderating U.S. retail rent growth data published by the company. Lower beta (0.92) indicates relative stability, but thin profit margins (0.22%) underscore execution challenges in a subdued CRE environment.
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) delivers comprehensive commercial real estate services, including leasing, property management, investment management, and advisory across offices, industrial, retail, and data centers globally. Its diversified revenue from fees, commissions, and asset management supports exposure to occupiers, investors, and developers. Recently, JLL shares have gained about 12.6% in the past month, trading near $339 within a 52-week range of $212 to $363, reflecting a 50% yearly advance. Positive drivers include strong leasing activity and capital markets recovery signals, with mentions of mandates like Tampa logistics hubs bolstering outlook. Higher beta (1.41) signals greater volatility, yet robust EPS ($16.39 TTM) and 3% profit margins highlight resilience. Q1 earnings anticipation adds to upward momentum in recent weeks.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 elite AI trading bots curated from over 351 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. These bots employ AI/ML for trend following, technical analysis, and risk-managed exits like take-profit (TP) at 2-3% and stop-loss (SL) at 2-10%, with performance highlights including annualized returns from +15% to +168%, win rates of 48-88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Top performers target sectors like semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, AMD), ETFs, gold miners, and aerospace, boasting profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in some cases. Suited to current volatility, they offer varied styles from 5-minute scalps to multi-day holds. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to align with market conditions.
CSGP’s data-centric model generates recurring subscriptions (price-to-sales ratio 4.72), contrasting JLL’s transactional services (P/S 0.63, where P/E means price-to-earnings ratio). Growth drivers differ: CSGP leverages marketplaces amid portal competition, while JLL benefits from leasing rebounds and advisory fees. Recent momentum favors JLL with monthly gains versus CSGP’s pullback, though both face CRE headwinds like office vacancies. Risk profiles show JLL’s higher leverage (debt-to-equity 34%) and beta, offset by stronger cash flow. Sector exposure overlaps in industrial/data centers, but sentiment tilts positive for JLL on earnings optimism versus CSGP’s buyback scrutiny.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor JLL in the current environment, given its consistent upward trend, superior monthly relative performance, and catalysts like leasing strength. CSGP offers stability and buyback support but lags in momentum and positioning. Probabilistic edge leans toward JLL for trend-following strategies amid recent real estate stabilization.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJLL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JLL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSGP (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -8.80% price change this week, while JLL (@Real Estate Development) price change was -1.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.31%.
CSGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
JLL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CSGP | JLL | CSGP / JLL | |
| Capitalization | 11.9B | 13.7B | 87% |
| EBITDA | 272M | 1.48B | 18% |
| Gain YTD | -56.544 | -12.373 | 457% |
| P/E Ratio | 417.43 | 15.86 | 2,632% |
| Revenue | 3.41B | 26.8B | 13% |
| Total Cash | 1.22B | 436M | 279% |
| Total Debt | 1.19B | 3.98B | 30% |
CSGP | JLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JLL's Valuation (86) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSGP (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (91) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CSGP (65) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to CSGP’s over the last 12 months.
CSGP's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JLL (79) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that CSGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than JLL’s over the last 12 months.
| CSGP | JLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 57% | 22 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JLL | 100% | -0.82% | ||
| CBRE - JLL | 89% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| CWK - JLL | 82% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| NMRK - JLL | 82% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CIGI - JLL | 69% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| MMI - JLL | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
More | ||||