CBZ
Price
$35.26
Change
+$1.32 (+3.89%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ULS
Price
$96.93
Change
-$1.48 (-1.50%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
19.54B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBZ vs ULS

Header iconCBZ vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts CBZ vs ULSBanner chart's image
CBZ vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBZ vs. ULS commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBZ is a Buy and ULS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CBZ: $35.26 vs. ULS: $96.93)
Brand notoriety: CBZ and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBZ: 83% vs. ULS: 86%
Market capitalization -- CBZ: $1.89B vs. ULS: $19.54B
CBZ [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $1.89B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $19.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the long-term than CBZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBZ is a better buy in the short-term than ULS.

Price Growth

CBZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +3.92% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+3.51% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULS($19.5B) has a higher market cap than CBZ($1.89B). ULS has higher P/E ratio than CBZ: ULS (56.35) vs CBZ (13.83). ULS YTD gains are higher at: 23.306 vs. CBZ (-30.109). ULS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 732M vs. CBZ (418M). ULS has more cash in the bank: 258M vs. CBZ (28.7M). ULS has less debt than CBZ: ULS (539M) vs CBZ (1.99B). ULS has higher revenues than CBZ: ULS (3.11B) vs CBZ (2.77B).
CBZULSCBZ / ULS
Capitalization1.89B19.5B10%
EBITDA418M732M57%
Gain YTD-30.10923.306-129%
P/E Ratio13.8356.3525%
Revenue2.77B3.11B89%
Total Cash28.7M258M11%
Total Debt1.99B539M369%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBZ: Fundamental Ratings
CBZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBZULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYK73.880.51
+0.70%
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF
MPRO32.660.02
+0.07%
Monarch ProCap ETF
GJS23.51N/A
N/A
Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities STRATS 2006-2 Goldman Sachs Group
HFSI35.23-0.01
-0.01%
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
VNAM24.26-0.43
-1.74%
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF

CBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBZ has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBZ jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBZ
1D Price
Change %
CBZ100%
+3.89%
EXPO - CBZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
FA - CBZ
48%
Loosely correlated
+5.98%
FCN - CBZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
LZ - CBZ
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STRA - CBZ
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ULS and ARMK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ULS and ARMK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
-1.50%
ARMK - ULS
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
TRI - ULS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
CBZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
AZZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
LZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More