CBZ
Price
$54.46
Change
-$0.14 (-0.26%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.96B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ULS
Price
$77.46
Change
+$0.65 (+0.85%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
15.64B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBZ vs ULS

CBZ vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBZ vs. ULS commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBZ is a StrongBuy and ULS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CBZ: $54.46 vs. ULS: $77.46)
Brand notoriety: CBZ and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBZ: 88% vs. ULS: 56%
Market capitalization -- CBZ: $2.96B vs. ULS: $15.64B
CBZ [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $2.96B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $15.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CBZ and ULS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the short-term than CBZ.

Price Growth

CBZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+0.44% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULS($15.6B) has a higher market cap than CBZ($2.96B). ULS has higher P/E ratio than CBZ: ULS (31.23) vs CBZ (26.18). CBZ YTD gains are higher at: 7.948 vs. ULS (-1.462). ULS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 732M vs. CBZ (418M). ULS has more cash in the bank: 258M vs. CBZ (28.7M). ULS has less debt than CBZ: ULS (539M) vs CBZ (1.99B). ULS has higher revenues than CBZ: ULS (3.11B) vs CBZ (2.77B).
CBZULSCBZ / ULS
Capitalization2.96B15.6B19%
EBITDA418M732M57%
Gain YTD7.948-1.462-544%
P/E Ratio26.1831.2384%
Revenue2.77B3.11B89%
Total Cash28.7M258M11%
Total Debt1.99B539M369%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBZ: Fundamental Ratings
CBZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBZULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGR16.890.19
+1.12%
Blackrock Energy and Resources Trust
EDGH34.550.17
+0.49%
3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETF
IWDL70.280.29
+0.42%
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Fctr TR ETN
UECG4.290.01
+0.27%
Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF
GARP84.67-0.49
-0.58%
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF

CBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBZ has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBZ jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBZ
1D Price
Change %
CBZ100%
-0.26%
EXPO - CBZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
FA - CBZ
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
GPN - CBZ
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
LZ - CBZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
RELX - CBZ
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ULS and ARMK have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ULS and ARMK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
+0.85%
ARMK - ULS
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
CBZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
AZZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
LZ - ULS
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
DLB - ULS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More