Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAOX vs FKTQX
CCAOX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts CCAOX vs FKTQX
CCAOX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAOX vs. FKTQX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAOX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. CCAOX (306M). FKTQX pays higher dividends than CCAOX: FKTQX (3.91) vs CCAOX (3.05). CCAOX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: CCAOX (29 years) vs FKTQX (9 years). CCAOX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.47). CCAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FKTQX (11.93). CCAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: CCAOX (2000) vs FKTQX (1000000). FKTQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.21 vs. CCAOX (6.78). FKTQX return over 5 years is better than : -0.40 vs. CCAOX (-3.37).
| CCAOX | FKTQX | CCAOX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.47 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.47 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.643 | 1.643 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306M | 13.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 3.91 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 7.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.65 | 12.08 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.37 | -0.40 | 849% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers