Advertisement
CCC vs CXM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCC is a Hold and CXM is a Hold.
| CCC | CXM | CCC / CXM | |
| Capitalization | 4.05B | 1.27B | 318% |
| EBITDA | 338M | 65.5M | 516% |
| Gain YTD | -13.333 | -29.563 | 45% |
| P/E Ratio | 98.14 | 54.80 | 179% |
| Revenue | 1.11B | 873M | 127% |
| Total Cash | 116M | 453M | 26% |
| Total Debt | 1.36B | 41.4M | 3,275% |
CCC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CCC | CXM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 74% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while CXM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CXM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCC (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.26% price change this week, while CXM (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
CXM is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
CCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCC has been loosely correlated with GWRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCC jumps, then GWRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCC | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| GWRE - CCC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| INTA - CCC | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| CRM - CCC | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| CXM - CCC | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| VERX - CCC | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
CXM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXM | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| FRSH - CXM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BL - CXM | 68% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| ASAN - CXM | 66% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| TEAM - CXM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| WDAY - CXM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||