Ad is loading...
CCCNX vs GLPIX
CCCNX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. GLPIX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and GLPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.56B vs. CCCNX (1.02B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCNX: GLPIX (6.29) vs CCCNX (5.45). CCCNX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCNX (14 years) vs GLPIX (12 years). GLPIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCNX (47.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.19 vs. GLPIX (6.91). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 250.73 vs. GLPIX (237.63).
| CCCNX | GLPIX | CCCNX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.19 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.19 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.455 | -4.507 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 1.56B | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.45 | 6.29 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.19 | 6.91 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.87 | 50.33 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 250.73 | 237.63 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.81 | 17.55 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...