Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs GLPIX
CCCNX vs GLPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. GLPIX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and GLPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CCCNX (1.01B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than CCCNX: GLPIX (6.91) vs CCCNX (5.82). CCCNX was incepted earlier than GLPIX: CCCNX (15 years) vs GLPIX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CCCNX (91.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: GLPIX (0) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. GLPIX (4.43). CCCNX (218.30) and GLPIX (212.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCCNX | GLPIX | CCCNX / GLPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 6.74 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 6.74 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.887 | -1.024 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 1.55B | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.82 | 6.91 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 4.43 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.49 | 61.90 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 218.30 | 212.23 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.72 | 55.76 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement