Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CCCNX (1.09B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.68) vs SMFPX (3.39). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (15 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). CCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. SMFPX (17.57). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 210.04 vs. SMFPX (152.19).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.12 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.619 | 3.193 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.28B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.68 | 3.39 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.98 | 17.57 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.36 | 73.70 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 210.04 | 152.19 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.36 | 31.65 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement