Ad is loading...
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. CCCNX (1.23B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.35) vs SMFPX (4.75). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CCCNX (47.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.59 vs. SMFPX (52.07). SMFPX (92.29) and CCCNX (90.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.333 | 9.047 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 1.33B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.35 | 4.75 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 59.59 | 52.07 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.43 | 85.17 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.89 | 92.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.72 | 40.66 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...