Ad is loading...
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. CCCNX (1.13B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.35) vs SMFPX (4.75). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CCCNX (47.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.32 vs. SMFPX (37.02). SMFPX (80.93) and CCCNX (79.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 42.576 | 35.105 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 1.21B | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.35 | 4.75 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.32 | 37.02 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 102.75 | 81.97 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.14 | 80.93 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.91 | 22.14 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...