Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. CCCNX (1.08B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.79) vs SMFPX (3.42). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). CCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.29 vs. SMFPX (13.49). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 222.01 vs. SMFPX (154.28).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.12 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.330 | 2.986 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.26B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.79 | 3.42 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.29 | 13.49 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.22 | 54.94 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 222.01 | 154.28 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.45 | 55.81 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement