Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. CCCNX (1.01B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.82) vs SMFPX (3.37). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). CCCNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. SMFPX (74.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. CCCNX (5.63). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 218.30 vs. SMFPX (163.05).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.12 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.887 | 1.589 | -182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 1.23B | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.82 | 3.37 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 7.06 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.49 | 66.06 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 218.30 | 163.05 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.72 | 56.74 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement