Ad is loading...
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a Buy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CCCNX (1.17B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.35) vs SMFPX (4.75). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CCCNX (47.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.83 vs. SMFPX (37.28). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 100.16 vs. SMFPX (92.88).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.454 | 4.173 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 1.31B | 90% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.35 | 4.75 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.83 | 37.28 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.98 | 81.49 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.16 | 92.88 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.43 | 25.05 | 157% |