Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCCNX vs SMFPX
CCCNX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCCNX vs. SMFPX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCCNX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. CCCNX (1.11B). CCCNX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CCCNX (5.92) vs SMFPX (3.64). CCCNX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CCCNX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than CCCNX (1.24). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CCCNX (47.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCCNX: SMFPX (1000) vs CCCNX (1000000). CCCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.37 vs. SMFPX (19.14). CCCNX return over 5 years is better than : 191.59 vs. SMFPX (143.03).
| CCCNX | SMFPX | CCCNX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 2.12 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 2.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.005 | 1.610 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 1.26B | 88% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.92 | 3.64 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.37 | 19.14 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.86 | 55.88 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.59 | 143.03 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.60 | 18.06 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement