Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCERX vs RWMFX
CCERX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CCERX vs RWMFX
CCERX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCERX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCERX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CCERX (492M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CCERX: RWMFX (1.41) vs CCERX (0.38). CCERX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CCERX (21 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). CCERX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). CCERX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). CCERX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: CCERX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.12 vs. CCERX (0.35). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.51 vs. CCERX (-1.75).
| CCERX | RWMFX | CCERX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.31 | 348% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.31 | 474% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.884 | 4.229 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 492M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.41 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.35 | 2.12 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.57 | 29.81 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.75 | 26.51 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.78 | 82.14 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers