Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCGSX vs RNPFX
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$27.46
Change-$0.26 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets441.05M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.52
Change-$0.63 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CCGSX (441M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: RNPFX (0.69) vs CCGSX (0.15). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGSX (10 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). CCGSX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.37 vs. RNPFX (12.54). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. RNPFX (28.29).
| CCGSX | RNPFX | CCGSX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.46 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.46 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.766 | 16.892 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.69 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.37 | 12.54 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 47.31 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 28.29 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement