Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs RNPFX
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs RNPFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$24.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets386.04M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$63.40
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.81B
CCGSX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. CCGSX (386M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: RNPFX (0.82) vs CCGSX (0.17). CCGSX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: CCGSX (9 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). CCGSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). RNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. CCGSX (15.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: RNPFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. RNPFX (5.72). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.98 vs. RNPFX (47.66).
| CCGSX | RNPFX | CCGSX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.46 | 228% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.46 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.085 | 1.966 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 386M | 142B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.82 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | 5.72 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.64 | 23.41 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.98 | 47.66 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.84 | - |