Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCIZX vs SHGTX
CCIZX vs SHGTX Comparison
Open Charts CCIZX vs SHGTX
CCIZX vs SHGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCIZX vs. SHGTX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCIZX is a Buy and SHGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 28.2B vs. SHGTX (4.63B). CCIZX (0.00) and SHGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CCIZX was incepted earlier than SHGTX: CCIZX (16 years) vs SHGTX (32 years). SHGTX (1.28) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.91). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. SHGTX (25.00). CCIZX (2000) and SHGTX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CCIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 92.51 vs. SHGTX (86.01). CCIZX return over 5 years is better than : 102.52 vs. SHGTX (92.66).
| CCIZX | SHGTX | CCIZX / SHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.25 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.28 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 50.525 | 49.294 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.2B | 4.63B | 610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 92.51 | 86.01 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 134.66 | 118.39 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.52 | 92.66 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 380.45 | 360.36 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement