Advertisement
CCLD vs LFMD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCLD is a Hold and LFMD is a StrongBuy.
CCLD sees MACD Histogram just turned negative
CCLD saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 12, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 45 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 30, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CCLD as a result. In 76 of 90 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CCLD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for CCLD entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where CCLD's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 30 of 35 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +2.48% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CCLD advanced for three days, in 193 of 232 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
CCLD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.322) is normal, around the industry mean (3.981). P/E Ratio (25.286) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.628). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.314) is also within normal values, averaging (2.133). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.699) is also within normal values, averaging (6.065).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 76 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CCLD’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CCLD’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 97, placing this stock worse than average.
LFMD's RSI Oscillator is sitting in oversold zone for 10 days
The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 19 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.57% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LFMD advanced for three days, in 249 of 290 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
LFMD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 24, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on LFMD as a result. In 75 of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for LFMD turned negative on September 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 43 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 43 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LFMD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for LFMD entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 9 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 10 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (13.145) is normal, around the industry mean (3.981). LFMD's P/E Ratio (-54.250) is considerably lower than the industry average of (13.628). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.133). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.788) is also within normal values, averaging (6.065).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. LFMD’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. LFMD’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 97, placing this stock worse than average.
CCLD | LFMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFMD's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCLD (75) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCLD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CCLD (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to CCLD’s over the last 12 months.
CCLD's SMR Rating (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LFMD (98) in the null industry. This means that CCLD’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
CCLD's Price Growth Rating (82) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LFMD (91) in the null industry. This means that CCLD’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCLD (87) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew significantly faster than CCLD’s over the last 12 months.
| CCLD | LFMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 87% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while LFMD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CCLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LFMD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCLD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFMD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCLD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LFMD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCLD (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LFMD (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -9.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.27%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCLD is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
LFMD is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-1.51% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
Advertisement
CCLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCLD has been loosely correlated with PRTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCLD jumps, then PRTH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCLD | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRTH - CCLD | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MDB - CCLD | 33% Loosely correlated | -7.30% | ||
| LFMD - CCLD | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| ALIT - CCLD | 30% Poorly correlated | +5.60% | ||
| COIN - CCLD | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.51% | ||
More | ||||
LFMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFMD has been loosely correlated with PAYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFMD jumps, then PAYS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFMD | 100% | +1.40% | ||
| PAYS - LFMD | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| AFRM - LFMD | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| DAVE - LFMD | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| TDOC - LFMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| VERX - LFMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.43% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VPC | 14.07 | 0.16 | +1.19% |
| Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) | |||
| BKAG | 40.65 | 0.36 | +0.90% |
| BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) | |||
| JHCB | 20.40 | 0.17 | +0.82% |
| John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB) | |||
| RFV | 146.75 | 0.17 | +0.11% |
| Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) | |||
| TDOG | 15.78 | -0.92 | -5.53% |
| 21Shares Dogecoin ETF (TDOG) | |||