Advertisement
CCLD vs LFMD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCLD is a Hold and LFMD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFMD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LFMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LFMD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LFMD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CCLD (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -3.09% price change this week, while LFMD (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -4.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCLD is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
LFMD is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.09% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| CCLD | LFMD | CCLD / LFMD | |
| Capitalization | 107M | 160M | 67% |
| EBITDA | 27.9M | -8.96M | -311% |
| Gain YTD | -14.041 | -2.933 | 479% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.86 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 124M | 193M | 64% |
| Total Cash | 3.35M | 34.5M | 10% |
| Total Debt | 5.74M | 6.17M | 93% |
CCLD | LFMD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 24 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LFMD's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CCLD (72) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to CCLD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CCLD (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew similarly to CCLD’s over the last 12 months.
LFMD's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCLD (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that LFMD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCLD’s over the last 12 months.
CCLD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LFMD (64) in the null industry. This means that CCLD’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
CCLD's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as LFMD (100) in the null industry. This means that CCLD’s stock grew similarly to LFMD’s over the last 12 months.
| CCLD | LFMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 20 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HFSFX | 19.34 | 0.22 | +1.15% |
| Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val F | |||
| SLASX | 45.42 | 0.42 | +0.93% |
| Selected American Shares S | |||
| PORIX | 61.64 | 0.50 | +0.82% |
| Trillium ESG Global Equity Institutional | |||
| GBCIX | 20.45 | 0.14 | +0.69% |
| Gabelli Dividend Growth I | |||
| LGLOX | 60.70 | 0.26 | +0.43% |
| Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F3 | |||
CCLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCLD has been loosely correlated with PRTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCLD jumps, then PRTH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCLD | 100% | -4.56% | ||
| PRTH - CCLD | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| MDB - CCLD | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| ALIT - CCLD | 30% Poorly correlated | +6.04% | ||
| COIN - CCLD | 29% Poorly correlated | +8.20% | ||
| LFMD - CCLD | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
More | ||||
LFMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFMD has been loosely correlated with PAYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFMD jumps, then PAYS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LFMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LFMD | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| PAYS - LFMD | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| AFRM - LFMD | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| DAVE - LFMD | 38% Loosely correlated | +5.88% | ||
| VERX - LFMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| PAY - LFMD | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.11% | ||
More | ||||