CCRDF
Price
$6.21
Change
+$0.18 (+2.99%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
MZHOF
Price
$25.80
Change
-$1.36 (-5.01%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
43.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCRDF vs MZHOF

Header iconCCRDF vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts CCRDF vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Concordia Financial Group
Price$6.21
Change+$0.18 (+2.99%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.59B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$25.80
Change-$1.36 (-5.01%)
Volume$402
Capitalization43.65B
CCRDF vs MZHOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCRDF vs. MZHOF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRDF is a Buy and MZHOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CCRDF: $6.21 vs. MZHOF: $25.80)
Brand notoriety: CCRDF and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCRDF: 60% vs. MZHOF: 1%
Market capitalization -- CCRDF: $5.59B vs. MZHOF: $43.65B
CCRDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.59B. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $43.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCRDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCRDF and MZHOF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCRDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MZHOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCRDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • MZHOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCRDF is a better buy in the short-term than MZHOF.

Price Growth

CCRDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.79% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($43.6B) has a higher market cap than CCRDF($5.59B). CCRDF has higher P/E ratio than MZHOF: CCRDF (12.48) vs MZHOF (9.73). CCRDF YTD gains are higher at: 6.346 vs. MZHOF (5.738). CCRDF has less debt than MZHOF: CCRDF (2.28T) vs MZHOF (19.6T). MZHOF has higher revenues than CCRDF: MZHOF (2.67T) vs CCRDF (268B).
CCRDFMZHOFCCRDF / MZHOF
Capitalization5.59B43.6B13%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.3465.738111%
P/E Ratio12.489.73128%
Revenue268B2.67T10%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.28T19.6T12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCRDF vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
CCRDF
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4188
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1427
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5452
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8470
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (38). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (27). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (1). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (54). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

MZHOF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CCRDF (84). This means that MZHOF’s stock grew similarly to CCRDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCRDFMZHOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MZHOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWSX26.270.17
+0.65%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R2
CFIMX14.450.02
+0.14%
Clipper
VITSX147.95N/A
N/A
Vanguard Total Stock Market Idx I
KMDVX31.03N/A
N/A
Keeley Gabelli Mid Cap Dividend A
LAMHX24.51N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and MZHOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and MZHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
MZHOF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
IITSF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MZHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZHOF
1D Price
Change %
MZHOF100%
N/A
CCRDF - MZHOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPA - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
BNCDY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.01%
ISTR - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.75%
More