CCRDF
Price
$6.03
Change
+$0.48 (+8.65%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.59B
MZHOF
Price
$26.10
Change
+$0.89 (+3.53%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
43.65B
Ad is loading...

CCRDF vs MZHOF

Header iconCCRDF vs MZHOF Comparison
Open Charts CCRDF vs MZHOFBanner chart's image
Concordia Financial Group
Price$6.03
Change+$0.48 (+8.65%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization5.59B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$26.10
Change+$0.89 (+3.53%)
Volume$70.08K
Capitalization43.65B
CCRDF vs MZHOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCRDF vs. MZHOF commentary
Apr 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRDF is a Hold and MZHOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CCRDF: $6.03 vs. MZHOF: $26.10)
Brand notoriety: CCRDF and MZHOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCRDF: 91% vs. MZHOF: 472%
Market capitalization -- CCRDF: $5.59B vs. MZHOF: $43.65B
CCRDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.59B. MZHOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $43.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCRDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMZHOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CCRDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MZHOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCRDF and MZHOF are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

CCRDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MZHOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.59% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZHOF($43.6B) has a higher market cap than CCRDF($5.59B). CCRDF has higher P/E ratio than MZHOF: CCRDF (12.48) vs MZHOF (9.73). MZHOF YTD gains are higher at: 6.967 vs. CCRDF (3.397). CCRDF has less debt than MZHOF: CCRDF (2.28T) vs MZHOF (19.6T). MZHOF has higher revenues than CCRDF: MZHOF (2.67T) vs CCRDF (268B).
CCRDFMZHOFCCRDF / MZHOF
Capitalization5.59B43.6B13%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.3976.96749%
P/E Ratio12.489.73128%
Revenue268B2.67T10%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.28T19.6T12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCRDF vs MZHOF: Fundamental Ratings
CCRDF
MZHOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4827
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1425
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCRDF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (45). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (25). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (1). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (50). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

CCRDF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as MZHOF (61). This means that CCRDF’s stock grew similarly to MZHOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRET20.610.20
+0.98%
Global X SuperDividend® REIT ETF
EQL41.120.25
+0.61%
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
QARP50.380.19
+0.37%
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF
QTEC177.200.56
+0.32%
First Trust NASDAQ-100-Tech Sector ETF
RFEU64.98N/A
N/A
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Eurp ETF

CCRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCRDF and MZHOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCRDF and MZHOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCRDF
1D Price
Change %
CCRDF100%
N/A
MZHOF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
CHBAF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
IITSF - CCRDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
DSBX - CCRDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
More

MZHOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MZHOF and CCRDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MZHOF and CCRDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZHOF
1D Price
Change %
MZHOF100%
+3.52%
CCRDF - MZHOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBPA - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNCDY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIBEY - MZHOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
ISTR - MZHOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
More