Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCRZX vs RWMFX
CCRZX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CCRZX vs RWMFX
CCRZX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCRZX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRZX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CCRZX (5.07B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CCRZX: RWMFX (1.40) vs CCRZX (0.68). CCRZX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CCRZX (16 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). CCRZX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). CCRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCRZX: RWMFX (250) vs CCRZX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. CCRZX (8.75). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.15 vs. CCRZX (11.72).
| CCRZX | RWMFX | CCRZX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.701 | 6.052 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.40 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | 11.31 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.49 | 31.43 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.72 | 27.15 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.41 | 87.48 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement