Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCRZX vs RWMFX
CCRZX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts CCRZX vs RWMFX
CCRZX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCRZX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCRZX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CCRZX (5.23B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than CCRZX: RWMFX (1.41) vs CCRZX (0.66). CCRZX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: CCRZX (16 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). CCRZX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). CCRZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCRZX: RWMFX (250) vs CCRZX (2000). CCRZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.43 vs. RWMFX (5.49). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.78 vs. CCRZX (8.21).
| CCRZX | RWMFX | CCRZX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.31 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.271 | 5.853 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.23B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.41 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 5.49 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.93 | 31.74 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.21 | 26.78 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.51 | 79.92 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement