Advertisement
CCTG vs HAYW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCTG is a Hold and HAYW is a Hold.
| CCTG | HAYW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 29 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCTG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while HAYW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CCTG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HAYW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCTG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAYW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCTG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HAYW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCTG (@Electrical Products) experienced а -13.38% price change this week, while HAYW (@Electrical Products) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
HAYW is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-1.27% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
Advertisement
CCTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CCTG and WBX have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCTG and WBX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCTG | 100% | -2.70% | ||
| WBX - CCTG | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.05% | ||
| HAYW - CCTG | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ENVX - CCTG | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.14% | ||
| LTBR - CCTG | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| BLDP - CCTG | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||
HAYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAYW has been loosely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAYW jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAYW | 100% | N/A | ||
| RUN - HAYW | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| AYI - HAYW | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| ENPH - HAYW | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| HUBB - HAYW | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| ATKR - HAYW | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||