CCU vs STZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCU is a StrongBuy and STZ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- STZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCU (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +3.88% price change this week, while STZ (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +8.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -0.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCU is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jun 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-0.00% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| CCU | STZ | CCU / STZ | |
| Capitalization | 2.19B | 48.6B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 211B | 2.86B | 7,370% |
| Gain YTD | 27.626 | -13.758 | -201% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.64 | 30.86 | 67% |
| Revenue | 2.76T | 9.82B | 28,116% |
| Total Cash | 631B | 200M | 315,500% |
| Total Debt | 1.36T | 11.7B | 11,615% |
CCU | STZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 73 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCU's Valuation (28) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (42). This means that CCU’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
CCU's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (91). This means that CCU’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
CCU's SMR Rating (47) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (73). This means that CCU’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCU (98). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCU’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCU (78). This means that STZ’s stock grew significantly faster than CCU’s over the last 12 months.
| CCU | STZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 73% | 8 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 30% |
CCU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCU has been loosely correlated with BUD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCU jumps, then BUD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCU | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| BUD - CCU | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| FMX - CCU | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.13% | ||
| DEO - CCU | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
| CABGY - CCU | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.33% | ||
| PRNDY - CCU | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||
STZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.