Advertisement
SAM vs STZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAM is a Hold and STZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- STZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
SAM (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -14.69% price change this week, while STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -6.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
SAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-1.20% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| SAM | STZ | SAM / STZ | |
| Capitalization | 1.82B | 24.5B | 7% |
| EBITDA | 229M | 3.16B | 7% |
| Gain YTD | -11.249 | 3.269 | -344% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.97 | 14.81 | 162% |
| Revenue | 1.95B | 9.14B | 21% |
| Total Cash | 164M | 102M | 161% |
| Total Debt | 34.7M | 11.2B | 0% |
SAM | STZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STZ's Valuation (36) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAM (83). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (100). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's SMR Rating (43) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAM (93). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (88). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (88). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
| SAM | STZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 59% | 10 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 38% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XPAY | 54.32 | 0.34 | +0.63% |
| Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF | |||
| RFLR | 30.40 | 0.14 | +0.46% |
| Innovator U.S. Small Cp Mgd Flr ETF | |||
| XSD | 565.19 | 0.93 | +0.16% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® Smcndctr ETF | |||
| XOCT | 39.15 | 0.06 | +0.14% |
| FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Oct | |||
| BYLD | 22.56 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF | |||
SAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAM has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAM jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAM | 100% | -3.35% | ||
| TAP - SAM | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| STZ - SAM | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| DEO - SAM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MGPI - SAM | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| HEINY - SAM | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
STZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with DEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then DEO could also see price increases.