Advertisement
STZ vs TAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STZ is a Hold and TAP is a Hold.
STZ's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for STZ turned positive on October 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where STZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on STZ as a result. In 56 of 96 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
STZ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +3.60% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where STZ advanced for three days, in 158 of 306 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where STZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
STZ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for STZ entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 17 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.336) is normal, around the industry mean (2.040). P/E Ratio (10.754) is within average values for comparable stocks, (16.716). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.436) is also within normal values, averaging (2.082). Dividend Yield (0.036) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.366) is also within normal values, averaging (1.539).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. STZ’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. STZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 74, placing this stock worse than average.
TAP's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TAP turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where TAP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 35 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TAP's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TAP as a result. In 59 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
Following a +3.55% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TAP advanced for three days, in 201 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 10-day moving average for TAP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 08, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 50%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TAP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
TAP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for TAP entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 10 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: TAP's P/B Ratio (0.668) is slightly lower than the industry average of (2.040). TAP has a moderately low P/E Ratio (8.525) as compared to the industry average of (16.716). TAP's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.924) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.082). Dividend Yield (0.053) settles around the average of (0.034) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.679) is also within normal values, averaging (1.539).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. TAP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TAP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 74, placing this stock worse than average.
STZ | TAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAP's Valuation (10) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (17). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (100). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's SMR Rating (42) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (95). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (59). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (89). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
| STZ | TAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 61% | 10 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 49% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
STZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- STZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
STZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- STZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +7.62% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was +4.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was +4.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 07, 2027.
TAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (+4.10% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
Advertisement
STZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.
TAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.