STZ
Price
$142.37
Change
+$1.76 (+1.25%)
Updated
May 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.51B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TAP
Price
$40.86
Change
+$0.05 (+0.12%)
Updated
May 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.67B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

STZ vs TAP

Header iconSTZ vs TAP Comparison
Open Charts STZ vs TAPBanner chart's image
STZ vs TAP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STZ vs. TAP commentary
May 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STZ is a Hold and TAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 16, 2026
Stock price -- (STZ: $140.61 vs. TAP: $40.84)
Brand notoriety: STZ and TAP are both notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STZ: 84% vs. TAP: 81%
Market capitalization -- STZ: $24.51B vs. TAP: $7.67B
STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $24.51B. TAP’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $7.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $157.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $25.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STZ is a better buy in the long-term than TAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAP is a better buy in the short-term than STZ.

Price Growth

STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -6.42% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 08, 2026.

TAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-1.20% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STZ($24.5B) has a higher market cap than TAP($7.67B). STZ has higher P/E ratio than TAP: STZ (14.81) vs TAP (8.52). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 3.269 vs. TAP (-11.610). STZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.16B vs. TAP (-1.45B). TAP has more cash in the bank: 383M vs. STZ (102M). TAP has less debt than STZ: TAP (6.27B) vs STZ (11.2B). TAP has higher revenues than STZ: TAP (11.2B) vs STZ (9.14B).
STZTAPSTZ / TAP
Capitalization24.5B7.67B320%
EBITDA3.16B-1.45B-218%
Gain YTD3.269-11.610-28%
P/E Ratio14.818.52174%
Revenue9.14B11.2B82%
Total Cash102M383M27%
Total Debt11.2B6.27B179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STZ vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
STZ
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5458
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7969
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAP's Valuation (19) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (36). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (100). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's SMR Rating (43) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (95). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (64). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (79). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STZTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XPAY54.320.34
+0.63%
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
RFLR30.400.14
+0.46%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Mgd Flr ETF
XSD565.190.93
+0.16%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Smcndctr ETF
XOCT39.150.06
+0.14%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Oct
BYLD22.560.02
+0.09%
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with DEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then DEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
+0.06%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
SAM - STZ
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
TAP - STZ
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.47%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
BUD - STZ
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
More