STZ | TAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAP's Valuation (10) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (17). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (100). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's SMR Rating (41) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (95). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (64). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (88). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
| STZ | TAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 37% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 52% | 10 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 46% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
STZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
STZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -5.25% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -6.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.60%.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 06, 2026.
TAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BTCC | 13.81 | 0.08 | +0.56% |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | |||
| RDVY | 78.94 | -0.65 | -0.82% |
| First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) | |||
| WCPB | 24.61 | -0.22 | -0.88% |
| Weitz Core Plus Bond ETF (WCPB) | |||
| DSTX | 34.70 | -0.52 | -1.49% |
| Distillate International Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTX) | |||
| HTD | 22.88 | -0.56 | -2.39% |
| John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.