STZ
Price
$137.47
Change
+$0.59 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
23.48B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TAP
Price
$39.78
Change
+$0.74 (+1.90%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.48B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

STZ vs TAP

STZ vs TAP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STZ vs. TAP commentary
Jul 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STZ is a Hold and TAP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2026
Stock price -- (STZ: $137.47 vs. TAP: $39.78)
Brand notoriety: STZ and TAP are both notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STZ: 108% vs. TAP: 81%
Market capitalization -- STZ: $23.48B vs. TAP: $7.48B
STZ [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $23.48B. TAP’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $7.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $156.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $40.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • STZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STZ is a better buy in the long-term than TAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAP is a better buy in the short-term than STZ.

Price Growth

STZ (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -4.83% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

STZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 01, 2026.

TAP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-1.07% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STZ($23.5B) has a higher market cap than TAP($7.48B). STZ has higher P/E ratio than TAP: STZ (14.73) vs TAP (8.52). STZ YTD gains are higher at: 0.962 vs. TAP (-12.873). STZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.16B vs. TAP (-1.45B). TAP has more cash in the bank: 383M vs. STZ (102M). TAP has less debt than STZ: TAP (6.27B) vs STZ (11.2B). TAP has higher revenues than STZ: TAP (11.2B) vs STZ (9.14B).
STZTAPSTZ / TAP
Capitalization23.5B7.48B314%
EBITDA3.16B-1.45B-218%
Gain YTD0.962-12.873-7%
P/E Ratio14.738.52173%
Revenue9.14B11.2B82%
Total Cash102M383M27%
Total Debt11.2B6.27B179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STZ vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
STZ
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1340
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7768
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAP's Valuation (11) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (24). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (100). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's SMR Rating (42) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (96). This means that STZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (60). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (77). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STZTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASTS71.45N/A
N/A
AST SpaceMobile
TGL3.89N/A
N/A
Treasure Global Inc.
KYIV14.75N/A
N/A
Kyivstar Group Ltd
HIPO28.93-0.41
-1.40%
Hippo Holdings
SLQT0.79-0.10
-10.83%
SelectQuote

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with DEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then DEO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
+0.43%
DEO - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.40%
TAP - STZ
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
SAM - STZ
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
MGPI - STZ
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BUD - STZ
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
More

TAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAP
1D Price
Change %
TAP100%
+1.90%
SAM - TAP
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
STZ - TAP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
BUD - TAP
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
DEO - TAP
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.40%
ABEV - TAP
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More