It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDLR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKBR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDLR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KBR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CDLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -9.72% price change this week, while KBR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +234.96%.
CDLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.
KBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
CDLR | KBR | CDLR / KBR | |
Capitalization | 1.69B | 5.59B | 30% |
EBITDA | 318M | 879M | 36% |
Gain YTD | -15.137 | -24.384 | 62% |
P/E Ratio | 6.07 | 13.65 | 44% |
Revenue | 465M | 8.05B | 6% |
Total Cash | 53M | 266M | 20% |
Total Debt | 1.21B | 2.83B | 43% |
KBR | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CDLR | KBR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago54% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago63% | 5 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SVYAX | 11.96 | 0.10 | +0.84% |
SEI US Managed Volatility A (SIIT) | |||
EIPTX | 14.91 | 0.05 | +0.34% |
UBS Engage For Impact P2 | |||
MIOPX | 32.17 | 0.10 | +0.31% |
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp A | |||
HBLVX | 15.27 | 0.03 | +0.20% |
Hartford Balanced Income R6 | |||
IGFRX | 25.01 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
Invesco EQV International Equity R6 |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDLR and SHIM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDLR and SHIM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CDLR | 100% | -1.61% | ||
SHIM - CDLR | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
AMRC - CDLR | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.29% | ||
MTZ - CDLR | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
ACM - CDLR | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
KBR - CDLR | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBR has been loosely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBR jumps, then J could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KBR | 100% | -0.87% | ||
J - KBR | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
ACM - KBR | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
TTEK - KBR | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
EXPO - KBR | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
GVA - KBR | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More |