CDNS
Price
$352.38
Change
-$1.95 (-0.55%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
95.93B
78 days until earnings call
MSFT
Price
$522.04
Change
+$1.20 (+0.23%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.88T
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDNS vs MSFT

Header iconCDNS vs MSFT Comparison
Open Charts CDNS vs MSFTBanner chart's image
Cadence Design Systems
Price$352.38
Change-$1.95 (-0.55%)
Volume$1.37M
Capitalization95.93B
Microsoft
Price$522.04
Change+$1.20 (+0.23%)
Volume$15.53M
Capitalization3.88T
CDNS vs MSFT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNS vs. MSFT commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNS is a StrongBuy and MSFT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (CDNS: $352.38 vs. MSFT: $522.04)
Brand notoriety: CDNS: Not notable vs. MSFT: Notable
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNS: 83% vs. MSFT: 85%
Market capitalization -- CDNS: $95.93B vs. MSFT: $3.88T

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMSFT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MSFT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSFT is a better buy in the long-term than CDNS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSFT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSFT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDNS is a better buy in the short-term than MSFT.

Price Growth

CDNS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.29% price change this week, while MSFT (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

MSFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.49% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSFT($3.88T) has a higher market cap than CDNS($95.9B). CDNS has higher P/E ratio than MSFT: CDNS (95.15) vs MSFT (38.27). MSFT YTD gains are higher at: 24.329 vs. CDNS (17.280). MSFT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 160B vs. CDNS (1.74B). MSFT has more cash in the bank: 94.6B vs. CDNS (2.82B). CDNS has less debt than MSFT: CDNS (2.48B) vs MSFT (60.6B). MSFT has higher revenues than CDNS: MSFT (282B) vs CDNS (5.09B).
CDNSMSFTCDNS / MSFT
Capitalization95.9B3.88T2%
EBITDA1.74B160B1%
Gain YTD17.28024.32971%
P/E Ratio95.1538.27249%
Revenue5.09B282B2%
Total Cash2.82B94.6B3%
Total Debt2.48B60.6B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNS vs MSFT: Fundamental Ratings
CDNS
MSFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1213
SMR RATING
1..100
4229
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1816
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2036
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSFT's Valuation (49) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNS (85) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MSFT (13) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's SMR Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CDNS (42) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

MSFT's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CDNS (18) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that MSFT’s stock grew similarly to CDNS’s over the last 12 months.

CDNS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as MSFT (36) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CDNS’s stock grew similarly to MSFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNSMSFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBEF45.070.40
+0.90%
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
CIF1.760.01
+0.86%
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund
RSPM32.150.16
+0.50%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Matrls ETF
WIW8.82N/A
N/A
Western Asset Inflation-Linked Opportunities & Income Fund
FOXY26.42-0.08
-0.32%
Simplify Currency Strategy ETF

MSFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSFT has been loosely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSFT jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSFT
1D Price
Change %
MSFT100%
+0.23%
NOW - MSFT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
CDNS - MSFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
CRWD - MSFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
COIN - MSFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SNPS - MSFT
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More