Advertisement
CDW vs CSPI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDW is a Hold and CSPI is a Hold.
CDW | CSPI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CDW's Valuation (11) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSPI (89) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CDW’s stock grew significantly faster than CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
CSPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as CDW (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSPI’s stock grew similarly to CDW’s over the last 12 months.
CDW's SMR Rating (24) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSPI (91) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CDW’s stock grew significantly faster than CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
CDW's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CSPI (71) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that CDW’s stock grew similarly to CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
CSPI's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDW (66) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDW’s over the last 12 months.
| CDW | CSPI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 60% | 8 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while CSPI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CDW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CSPI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSPI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CDW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CSPI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CDW (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -2.60% price change this week, while CSPI (@Information Technology Services) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
CDW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-2.33% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
Advertisement
CDW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDW has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDW jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDW | 100% | +5.98% | ||
| FLYW - CDW | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| HCKT - CDW | 54% Loosely correlated | +9.15% | ||
| PSFE - CDW | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| PAY - CDW | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| XRX - CDW | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||
CSPI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSPI and CNDT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSPI and CNDT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSPI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSPI | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| CNDT - CSPI | 30% Poorly correlated | +5.13% | ||
| CDW - CSPI | 29% Poorly correlated | +5.98% | ||
| EPAM - CSPI | 28% Poorly correlated | +5.53% | ||
| KD - CSPI | 26% Poorly correlated | +7.64% | ||
| DXC - CSPI | 25% Poorly correlated | +7.48% | ||
More | ||||