CSPI saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 95 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 75 of the 95 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 79%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CSPI turned negative on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 34 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 74%.
CSPI moved below its 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CSPI declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
The Aroon Indicator for CSPI entered a downward trend on November 11, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 50 of 63 cases where CSPI's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
Following a +2.58% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CSPI advanced for three days, in 246 of 297 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
CSPI may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 6 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.651) is normal, around the industry mean (2.898). CSPI has a moderately low P/E Ratio (-103.571) as compared to the industry average of (18.492). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (5.940) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.017) settles around the average of (0.224) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.287) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 32 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CSPI’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CSPI’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The 50-day moving average for EPAM moved above the 200-day moving average on November 05, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on EPAM as a result. In 54 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for EPAM just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where EPAM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 36 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
EPAM moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for EPAM crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +6.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where EPAM advanced for three days, in 199 of 307 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 114 of 176 cases where EPAM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 65%.
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where EPAM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
EPAM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 35 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. EPAM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 66 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.336) is normal, around the industry mean (2.898). P/E Ratio (21.528) is within average values for comparable stocks, (18.492). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.575) is also within normal values, averaging (2.284). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.224) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.135) is also within normal values, averaging (139.965).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 66 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. EPAM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
CSPI | EPAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSPI's Valuation (6) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (66) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
CSPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSPI’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM's SMR Rating (66) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CSPI (91) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSPI (74) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
CSPI's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPAM (75) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
| CSPI | EPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSPI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while EPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSPI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSPI (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -5.88% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was +18.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.50%.
CSPI is expected to report earnings on Dec 15, 2026.
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2027.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSPI and CDW have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSPI and CDW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSPI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSPI | 100% | +3.23% | ||
| CDW - CSPI | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| EPAM - CSPI | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| KD - CSPI | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| DXC - CSPI | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| GLOB - CSPI | 24% Poorly correlated | -5.06% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 74% Closely correlated | -5.06% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| INFY - EPAM | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| G - EPAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HIBL | 77.40 | 6.69 | +9.46% |
| Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) | |||
| EFG | 39.92 | 0.29 | +0.74% |
| iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) | |||
| XCCC | 32.45 | 0.08 | +0.26% |
| BondBloxx CCC-Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) | |||
| DIV | 19.20 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Global X SuperDividend US ETF (DIV) | |||
| BSGT | 24.73 | -0.03 | -0.11% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2029 Treasury Bond ETF (BSGT) | |||