Advertisement
CSPI vs EPAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPI is a Hold and EPAM is a Hold.
CSPI | EPAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EPAM's Valuation (54) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSPI (89) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
CSPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as EPAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSPI’s stock grew similarly to EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM's SMR Rating (66) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CSPI (91) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
EPAM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CSPI (72) in the Computer Peripherals industry. This means that EPAM’s stock grew similarly to CSPI’s over the last 12 months.
CSPI's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Computer Peripherals industry is significantly better than the same rating for EPAM (79) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CSPI’s stock grew significantly faster than EPAM’s over the last 12 months.
| CSPI | EPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 4 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 66% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSPI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while EPAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSPI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EPAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSPI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EPAM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSPI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- EPAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CSPI (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while EPAM (@Information Technology Services) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
EPAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-2.34% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EDD | 5.34 | 0.10 | +1.91% |
| Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Debt Fund | |||
| PREF | 18.28 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Principal Spectrum Preferred Secs Active ETF (PREF) | |||
| ASHS | 40.14 | -0.27 | -0.67% |
| Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) | |||
| MYY | 15.72 | -0.16 | -1.03% |
| ProShares Short S&P Mid Cap400 (MYY) | |||
| KOLD | 27.75 | -1.63 | -5.55% |
| ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natural Gas (KOLD) | |||
CSPI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSPI and CNDT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSPI and CNDT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSPI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSPI | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| CNDT - CSPI | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
| CDW - CSPI | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| EPAM - CSPI | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.30% | ||
| KD - CSPI | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.62% | ||
| DXC - CSPI | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.64% | ||
More | ||||
EPAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAM has been closely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPAM jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPAM | 100% | -5.30% | ||
| GLOB - EPAM | 76% Closely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| ACN - EPAM | 73% Closely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| CTSH - EPAM | 70% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| INFY - EPAM | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| G - EPAM | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.06% | ||
More | ||||