Advertisement
CEG vs STZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CEG is a Hold and STZ is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CEG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CEG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CEG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- STZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CEG (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а +1.65% price change this week, while STZ (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -2.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 02, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (+0.90% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-2.08% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| CEG | STZ | CEG / STZ | |
| Capitalization | 58.6B | 48.6B | 121% |
| EBITDA | 4.76B | 2.86B | 166% |
| Gain YTD | 42.604 | -24.028 | -177% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.12 | 30.86 | 120% |
| Revenue | 24.9B | 9.82B | 254% |
| Total Cash | 368M | 200M | 184% |
| Total Debt | 9.26B | 11.7B | 79% |
STZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CEG | STZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 60% | 9 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 30% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IIGD | 24.56 | -0.05 | -0.18% |
| Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF | |||
| FIIG | 20.75 | -0.06 | -0.29% |
| First Trust Intermediate DurInvGrdCrpETF | |||
| FSEC | 43.00 | -0.13 | -0.30% |
| Fidelity Investment Grade Sec ETF | |||
| MYCM | 24.35 | -0.08 | -0.34% |
| SPDR SSGA My2033 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| GLOF | 48.29 | -0.19 | -0.40% |
| iShares Global Equity Factor ETF | |||
CEG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CEG and BEP have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEG and BEP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CEG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEG | 100% | -2.45% | ||
| BEP - CEG | 31% Poorly correlated | +6.25% | ||
| BEPC - CEG | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.94% | ||
| CWEN - CEG | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| AZREF - CEG | 22% Poorly correlated | -16.67% | ||
| RNW - CEG | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||
STZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.